Skip to comments.
Is Terri Schiavo Dead? Eat, drink, and vegetate
Reason ^
| 10-23-03
| Ronald Bailey
Posted on 10/25/2003 11:35:53 AM PDT by ambrose
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 521-540, 541-560, 561-580, 581-594 last
To: The Red Zone
No.
Whatch out, I mught change forms!
581
posted on
10/28/2003 5:39:34 PM PST
by
Gringo1
(Alabama...we speak gooder english than Georgia!)
To: The Red Zone
Is the word GHOUL supposed to be insulting?
I would have thought that the god squad could find a better one, it is a bit mild. Of course, that would be giving you mindless robots alot more credit than you deserve.
582
posted on
10/28/2003 5:45:44 PM PST
by
Gringo1
(Alabama...we speak gooder english than Georgia!)
To: Gringo1
Unplug her, if God wants her to live, she will. Is there any documented instance of anyone, anywhere, ever surviving more than 41 days without both food and water?
583
posted on
10/29/2003 6:36:59 AM PST
by
supercat
(Why is it that the more "gun safety" laws are passed, the less safe my guns seem?)
To: supercat
"Is there any documented instance of anyone, anywhere, ever surviving more than 41 days without both food and water?"
I don't know, but if god wants her to live like the god squad says, then god might send a bird or something to feed her. Or he might cure her through the use of a miracle.
But I don't really think that is what they want. They want an issue that puts them in the spotlight so they can say that their belief system overrides the rule of law and that this is a christian nation and a christian government, and nobody is allowed to die under any circumstances other than in the guidlines set by them.
(Basically, it is the same thing the terrorist muslims want, but in a nicer costume)
584
posted on
10/29/2003 6:45:58 AM PST
by
Gringo1
(Alabama...we speak gooder english than Georgia!)
To: Gringo1
I don't know, but if god wants her to live like the god squad says, then god might send a bird or something to feed her. Or he might cure her through the use of a miracle. Well, since she's been forbidden all efforts at oral feeding, sending a bird wouldn't do much good unless it could get past her guards. And even if she were substantially cured, MarMena has posted of cases in which people who were quite capable of asking for food were nonetheless denied because they were judged incompetant to make such medical decisions.
I believe in miracles, but subtle ones. If a bus is racing out of control down a mountain road, God might impart just a smidgin of horizontal momentum to keep the bus on the road when it would otherwise have gone down the cliff, but he's not going to suddenly turn the bus into an airplane.
585
posted on
10/29/2003 6:51:01 AM PST
by
supercat
(Why is it that the more "gun safety" laws are passed, the less safe my guns seem?)
To: Gringo1
That ought to get the GHOUL-callers out in force today.
I need my morning fix of good christian hatred.
I think GHOUL has about the same impact as calling someone 4-eyes, more humorous to see such a limited insult vocabulary than hurtful. It's like watching 2 downs syndrome kids trying to assemble an automatic transmission......just sad.
586
posted on
10/29/2003 6:53:18 AM PST
by
Gringo1
(Alabama...we speak gooder english than Georgia!)
To: supercat
That might be the most reasoned response that I have gotten on this thread. Thank you for making a good point without nastiness.
587
posted on
10/29/2003 6:55:18 AM PST
by
Gringo1
(Alabama...we speak gooder english than Georgia!)
To: Gringo1
That might be the most reasoned response that I have gotten on this thread. Thank you for making a good point without nastiness. Thanks. I would, btw, further posit that there have been miracles in this case, such as the fact that enough people have come together to soften a few hearts in the Florida legislature, and the fact that Terri has survived over 150 hours of dehydration.
Someone who removes a feeding tube while simultaneously forbidding any effort at oral feeding is seeking to choose, unambiguously and within a fairly narrow timeframe, the time at which a person will die. Such treatment will kill any person, regardless of prior health.
Supplying food and water will not keep alive someone whom God wants to "call home". Their denial, is guaranteed to kill anyone. Which course of action represents "playing God"?
588
posted on
10/29/2003 7:03:24 AM PST
by
supercat
(Why is it that the more "gun safety" laws are passed, the less safe my guns seem?)
To: Gringo1
"Unplug her, if God wants her to live, she will."
Unplugging someone who appears brain dead or completely comatose from a respirator is quite different from withholding food and water from someone where there is disagreement just how conscious the patient is.
If a person were to become quadraplegic and could no longer feed him/herself, would you say "Set the food in front of them, if they can feed themselves, they live. If not they die." I doubt you would.
Simply being unable to feed oneself seems a rather callous measurement as to whether they should live or die.
589
posted on
10/30/2003 1:40:37 PM PST
by
MEGoody
To: MEGoody
I've stated the difference between Terri Schiavo and a qudrapeligic numerous times. The argument is stupid and presumptive at the least.
590
posted on
10/30/2003 3:10:53 PM PST
by
Gringo1
(Alabama...we speak gooder english than Georgia!)
To: Gringo1
"I've stated the difference between Terri Schiavo and a qudrapeligic numerous times."
Maybe you did explain your view of the difference. I don't see a difference. If Terry were brain dead, that would be one thing. She isn't.
591
posted on
10/31/2003 2:02:00 PM PST
by
MEGoody
To: ambrose; Gringo1; All
I wish that I had noticed this thread a week or so ago, before I noticed and began to participate in a myriad of other 'Terri topic' threads at this site. The discussion here seems both more objective and more well thought through (by those on both sides of the issue) than I have seen demonstrated in the numerous 'save Terri' threads at this site.
Having said that, I'd like to refer the various posters in this thread to the following link, wherein I posted an invitation to any and all to participate in a private discussion of this topic with me. For complex reasons briefly explained in that post, I am longer participating in the open discussions of this 'Terri topic' at this site.
[As just a side note: So far I have had no takers on the invitation to a private discussion of the topic.)
To: Normally a Lurker
It is another gun control/abortion type topic. We just vent. You never can change anyones mind on it.
593
posted on
11/03/2003 1:36:42 PM PST
by
Gringo1
(Learn to speak Spanish or you cannot order a happy meal.)
To: Gringo1
Agreed - at least generally. I don't really expect to change anyones mind - only they can do that.
But, given the vast number of people discussing this, there may be a few, on the edge, whose mind may be open to change.
OTOH, you're most likely right, at least it's unlikely to happen HERE.
594
posted on
11/03/2003 1:46:54 PM PST
by
Normally a Lurker
(partial explanation is on my FR home page)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 521-540, 541-560, 561-580, 581-594 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson