Skip to comments.
Osama's Best Friend: The further connections between al Qaeda and Saddam
The Weekly Standard ^
| 11/03/03
| Stephen F. Hayes
Posted on 10/25/2003 10:00:38 AM PDT by Pokey78
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
1
posted on
10/25/2003 10:00:38 AM PDT
by
Pokey78
To: Pokey78
This obvious link between Al Q and Saddam will NOT be reported in Socialist/Marxist ENABLING main stream media. You probably won't even see this report on the Fox News Network.
2
posted on
10/25/2003 10:10:09 AM PDT
by
PISANO
To: Pokey78
I'm sorry, but the neocommunists traitors know and have assured us that there is no connection between OBL, 9/11, or Saddam. It is disrespectful to even suggest otherwise even as they are spending Saudi money demonstrating in Washington and San Francisco.
3
posted on
10/25/2003 10:38:58 AM PDT
by
Tacis
Comment #4 Removed by Moderator
Comment #5 Removed by Moderator
Comment #6 Removed by Moderator
To: Pokey78
I just ran across these revealing words from Saddam:
"If you use pressure, we will deploy pressure and force. We know that you can harm us although we do not threaten you. But we too can harm you. Everyone can cause harm according to their ability and their size. We cannot come all the way to you in the United States, but individual Arabs may reach you."
http://www.chss.montclair.edu/english/furr/glaspie.html
7
posted on
10/25/2003 10:40:55 AM PDT
by
Gorilla44
To: All
8
posted on
10/25/2003 10:53:53 AM PDT
by
Cindy
To: All
9
posted on
10/25/2003 11:08:26 AM PDT
by
Cindy
To: Pokey78; Dog
Thanks for posting this. We'll never see it in the NYT, et al.
Dog - check out the connections between Iraq and AQ.
10
posted on
10/25/2003 11:50:24 AM PDT
by
Peach
(The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
To: Peach
Index bump.
11
posted on
10/25/2003 4:07:59 PM PDT
by
FreedomPoster
(this space intentionally blank)
To: Pokey78
And the reason Salim is treated as a common criminal instead of being turned over to the CIA is ...
12
posted on
10/26/2003 7:17:18 AM PST
by
aculeus
To: Pokey78
13
posted on
06/24/2004 9:23:48 PM PDT
by
justshutupandtakeit
(America's Enemies: foreign and domestic RATmedia agree Bush must be destroyed.)
To: Peach; Fedora; Grampa Dave; STARWISE; justshutupandtakeit; Lancey Howard; Howlin; xzins; maica; ...
Six days after the Pentagon and World Trade Center attacks, Ahmad Hikmat Shakir was detained in Doha, Qatar, where he had resurfaced as an employee of the Qatari government's Ministry of Religious Development. Authorities searched Shakir and his apartment and were stunned by what they found: The Iraqi had contact information for Islamic radicals involved in many of the most devastating terrorist attacks of the past decade. These contacts included:
* Musab Yasin and Ibrahim Suleiman from the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. At the time of that attack, Yasin lived in New Jersey with his brother, Abdul Rahman Yasin. Abdul Rahman Yasin, who badly burned his leg while mixing the chemicals for the World Trade Center bomb, was interviewed by the FBI and, in a costly mistake, released. After it realized its error, the FBI placed him on the list of "Most Wanted" terrorists. But they were too late. Abdul Rahman Yasin had fled the United States for Iraq, where U.S. intelligence officials believe he remains today. Ibrahim Suleiman was a Kuwaiti native whose fingerprints were found on the bombmaking manuals authorities determined were used in planning the 1993 World Trade Center bombing.
* Zahid Sheikh Mohammed, brother of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the September 11 mastermind. Zahid Sheikh Mohammed and his brother are both believed to have planned "Operation Bojinka," the 1995 al Qaeda plot to explode simultaneously 12 airplanes over the Pacific Ocean. U.S. intelligence officials believe that aborted plot may have morphed into the September 11 attacks.
* Ammar al Baluchi, the nephew of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed. According to a report in Time magazine, al Baluchi provided $120,000 to Mohammed Atta and his fellow hijackers. Intelligence officials believe al Baluchi may have had a role in planning the attack on the USS Cole in October 2000.
* And, of course, Abu Hajer al Iraqi, the prison-guard gouger, who is suspected of involvement in several of these attacks as well as the 1998 embassy bombings. (The telephone number Shakir had for Abu Hajer was actually a number for Taba Investments, a well-known al Qaeda front.)
Despite this wealth of information, the Qataris released Shakir, the Iraqi airport facilitator, shortly after they detained him. He wasn't free for long. On October 21, 2001, Shakir flew from Doha to Amman, Jordan, where he was scheduled to transfer to a flight to Baghdad. He was arrested by Jordanian intelligence and held for three months without charge. CIA officials who questioned him concluded that Shakir was well-trained in counter-interrogation techniques. (One administration official points out that Shakir's counter-interrogation training appears to have been much more sophisticated than that of al Qaeda detainees being held at Guantanamo, a detail that, if true, may indicate that his instruction came from a government intelligence service.)
Not long after Shakir was detained, the Iraqi government began pressuring Jordanian intelligence for his release. Why exactly Shakir was discharged is unclear. In the period after the September 11 attacks, the Jordanian government was highly cooperative. It seems unlikely that they would release Shakir against the wishes of the U.S. government, especially at a time when the Bush administration was intensifying its rhetoric on Iraq. Nonetheless, Shakir was released on January 28, 2002, one day before President Bush focused world attention on Iraq as part of the "Axis of Evil" in his State of the Union address. U.S. intelligence officials believe Shakir quickly returned to Baghdad.
The evidence on Shakir, circumstantial at this point, seems to suggest a long relationship with senior al Qaeda operatives. What is less clear is Shakir's relationship--if any--to the deposed Iraqi regime. Many aspects of his story could be explained as mere coincidence. But three details make the most sense if one assumes the involvement of Iraqi intelligence: (1) the fact that an Iraqi embassy employee got him his airport job and controlled his schedule, (2) his extensive training in counter-interrogation, and (3) the fact that the Iraqi government was eager--by some accounts desperate--to get him out of Jordanian custody and back to Iraq.
There remain exponentially more questions than answers concerning Saddam Hussein's relationship to al Qaeda. Among them, it is a mere matter of detail to know why a native Iraqi, thanks to a contact in the Iraqi embassy, was in a position to escort two September 11 hijackers to a critical planning meeting, or why he possessed contact information for Osama bin Laden's "best friend." But the overarching fact--that Saddam and al Qaeda had a relationship--can no longer be seriously disputed.
14
posted on
08/24/2005 11:02:16 PM PDT
by
Enchante
(Kerry's mere nuisances: Marine Barracks '83, WTC '93, Khobar Towers, Embassy Bombs '98, USS Cole!!!)
To: Enchante
It is just about inconceivable that could possess contact info for a decade's worth of key terrorist figures and not be a major link between his obvious work for Iraqi intelligence and the Al Qaeda terrorists he hung out with. Out of the 1+ billion Muslims in the world, how many would have had contact info for those particular people??? Only the ones who were heavily involved with Al Qaeda....
15
posted on
08/24/2005 11:05:56 PM PDT
by
Enchante
(Kerry's mere nuisances: Marine Barracks '83, WTC '93, Khobar Towers, Embassy Bombs '98, USS Cole!!!)
To: Pokey78
We need to work on our laws...
Any aggravated assault with a deadly weapon that results in permanent and debilitating brain damage should be treated as equal to the commission of a murder. Especially if the intent to commit murder is provable, and the suspect botched it.
16
posted on
08/25/2005 4:42:00 AM PDT
by
coconutt2000
(NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
To: Enchante
17
posted on
08/25/2005 7:26:56 AM PDT
by
Peach
(The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
To: Tacis
Saudi money does not support these demonstrations that conjecture is complete BS.
To: justshutupandtakeit
"Saudi money does not support these demonstrations that conjecture is complete BS."
In fact, Saudi money does support these demonstrations. It passes through cover organizations first, but the Suadi claims, which you appear to repeat, that they do not fund US demonstrations, are complete BS.
19
posted on
08/25/2005 11:07:20 AM PDT
by
Tacis
("Democrats - The Party of Traitors, Treachery and Treason!")
To: Tacis
Let me be clearer there is no money from the Saudi government (which is the implication) funding these groups anymore than there is money from the US government. And I doubt that there is any money from Saudi citizens either.
The money comes from anti-American Americans. And you have NO proof to the contrary.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson