As much as that event might bring much relief to the majority here, I would not wish to give your harpies, to include oneida and the catsmeow, further cause to raise you higher on their shoulder pads.
You act like you want to be taken seriously,
The most common denominator with you and your ugly little clique is your unabashed escape to projection.
...but then you actually believe that the RC annulment process has any bearing whatsoever with the statutory machinations of civil dissolutions?
You are exceptionally careless as best for an attorney, but you may want to rephrase your gem (just for the common folk, you know):
"An RC church annulment is meaningless to civil separation or divorce, nor do civil statutes on annulment follow the same rules as curch annulment.
Now, you have either been careless, deliberately ignorant of the case law, or as I suspect a bit of both compounded by your continued demonstration of pulling everything you need out of your depressing need to be right...much like those thousands of plaintiffs who prevailed in defamation cases.
Say, you're not mochajoke are you?