Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Harmless Teddy Bear
"I am weird I guess but I would find Michael just going in and put a pillow over Terri's face it far less troubling then I find his going to court and trying to get societal approval for his actions."

No, you're not weird. You're absolutely correct. Difference is, that if he did that, he would still be charged with murder, now wouldn't he? But if he can get "society" to go along with the termination of Terri's life, the precedent is set and murder becomes legitimate under certain circumstances, to be determined by, who else, judges. People, we have a problem!

85 posted on 10/25/2003 9:28:02 AM PDT by sweetliberty ("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: All
The SCOTUS had no objection to the Connecticut legislature's exercising a judicial function and ordering a new trial in a will contest, setting aside a judicial decree, in CALDER v. BULL, 3 U.S. 386 (1798) .
86 posted on 10/25/2003 9:28:49 AM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson