Replies

I just show a short report on NBC TV news Sunday morning, with, I believe, Terri's "brother-in-law," (Scott Schiavo?) advocating her death and the father and brother trying to defend her. (The report was in progress when I started seeing it.)

Bob Schindler, Jr., brought up the possibility of "foul play," but the NBC correspondent, said, "Don't you have other things to worry about now?" The "foul play" possibility is not being accepted by "big media."

Terri is in as much danger now as she was prior to Oct. 15.

I now believe that she would be in better shape "legally" if Bush had acted with a regular executive order (as recommended by 12 legal scholars) and not a legislative act. It would have been harder and longer to challenge an executive order than it will be for the liberals to get this "Terri's law" struck down. I hope I'm wrong.

No, it was Scott Swope, a colleague of George J. Felos in this case, who was on NBC morning news today defending the starvation of Terri, not Scott Schiavo, the brother of Michael R. Sciavo. However, Scott Schiavo says that he too heard Terri say that she did not want to be kept alive "artificially" in event of some disaster. That is one of the "witnesses" that George W. Greer is using to justify his starvation order.