Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Former POW's Family Says Army Shortchanged Her (Disgusting!!!)
FoxNews ^ | Friday, October 24, 2003 | AP

Posted on 10/25/2003 4:56:35 AM PDT by milan

Edited on 04/22/2004 12:37:26 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

EL PASO, Texas

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: jessicalynch; lynch; pow; shoshanajohnson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last
As soon as read Jesse Jackson, I no longer took the story seriously. Shoshana should be glad that she is only 30% disabled. Why would she possibly want 80%disability? My brother has 50% and is in pain everyday! Poor Jessica will probably suffer from ARthritis etc. from all the broken bones.

Is this affirmative action for POWs? Sick, absolutely sick!!!

1 posted on 10/25/2003 4:56:36 AM PDT by milan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: milan
All they really have to do is compare the severity of injuries. Anyone can see that Lynch was far more severely injured. Johnson will have far more ability and function than Lynch and be better able to support herself. Maybe Jackson should go complain to the Iraqis for not bashing Johnson up as much as Lynch, the darn racists.
2 posted on 10/25/2003 5:03:53 AM PDT by milemark ("shhh... don't act so liberal in public, at least 'till you're elected" - Bill Clinton to 'rats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: milan
Jessica Lynch has come out in support of Shoshana. Shoshana comes from a military family. She and her family have served with honor. If she is being shortchanged that should be corrected. Too bad Jesse's involved. He taints everything he touches, but Shoshana should not pay for that.
3 posted on 10/25/2003 5:15:55 AM PDT by veronica ("I just realised I have a perfect part for you in "Terminator 4"....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica
I would be surprised if, when you compare Johnson's disability determination with other soldiers with injuries similar to hers, you find anything out of line. You can't compare the Lynch and Johnson cases because the disparity in the severity of the injuries is too great.
4 posted on 10/25/2003 5:24:51 AM PDT by milemark ("shhh... don't act so liberal in public, at least 'till you're elected" - Bill Clinton to 'rats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: milemark
Shot in both legs and held twice as long as Jessica. Sure there is difference in the injuries, but the disparity of the awards is too great.

85% of these determinations are overturned in the Vet's favor if they appeal. So it sounds to me like the initial board reviews are based on limiting exposure, not fair determination by exacting standards.

She went to a combat zone, I sat at home in comfortable middle age. Giving her 1200 a month for parity wouldn't be even 100th on my list of items I was worried that my horrendous tax bill was paying for in the future.

I think service should be properly recognized with the arbitrary nature taken out of this. May our nation bless our young veterans.

5 posted on 10/25/2003 5:33:14 AM PDT by KC Burke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: milan
Shoshana Johnson

She may be entitled to 100% disability. From seein her on TV she appears to be brain dead.

6 posted on 10/25/2003 5:33:29 AM PDT by JesseHousman (Execute Mumia Abu-Jamal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: milan
The level of disability is determined by the Veteran's Administration, not the U.S. Army.

It isn't based on how graphic the injuries or how long someone was a POW; it is based on a very structured formula that measures actual physical disability. It cannot be determined by comparing one soldier against another unless their actual remaining physical disability is identical.

7 posted on 10/25/2003 5:40:44 AM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KC Burke
85% of these determinations are overturned in the Vet's favor if they appeal.

So why not appeal? Why bring in Jesse Jackson and scream racism? Jackson will just use her to get his fat face on TV and dump her for the next situation in need of photography.

8 posted on 10/25/2003 5:45:30 AM PDT by milemark ("shhh... don't act so liberal in public, at least 'till you're elected" - Bill Clinton to 'rats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: veronica
I agree that she is entitled to everything she deserves. Problem is, I saw her walking. I saw Jessica bed ridden for months. Jessic is worse, she gets more money...that is how the system works. It is not based on race. It is also not fair. Disabled veterans don't get hardly anything, but the point is, it is equally unfair.
9 posted on 10/25/2003 5:53:22 AM PDT by milan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: milemark
We have no knowledge that Specialist Johnson called in, or invited interest from, Jesseeeee "Ambulance-chaser" Jackson. He is about self promotion.

She did confere with her fellow unit member and the information made her dad complain publically. If my son is injured in combat and not treated with parity, I'll be the nastiest letter-writting, phone calling, in-your-face, tactician that you can imagine. Blood is blood.

10 posted on 10/25/2003 5:53:24 AM PDT by KC Burke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: milan
Certainly, if Shoshana believes her disabilities have been understated, request of a review of that evaluation would be understandable. My recollection of the tapes of her rescue did not look like her injuries were anywhere near the severity of Jessica's. The introduction of Jesse Jackson into the mix is not good for Shoshana or equity.
11 posted on 10/25/2003 5:57:51 AM PDT by AMNZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KC Burke
Giving her 1200 a month for parity wouldn't be even 100th on my list of items I was worried that my horrendous tax bill was paying for in the future.

I agree, but as I said, my brother is 50% and his injuries keep him from walking long periods (over an hour) and he isn't pissing and complaining with the help of Jesse Jackson. Shoshana got what she deserved from an unfair system. She could have denied Jesse's mouth or came out and said she did not need Jackson's support. That tells me that she thinks the "man" is screwing her. That is a load of crap!

12 posted on 10/25/2003 5:58:23 AM PDT by milan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JesseHousman
Shoshana Johnson She may be entitled to 100% disability. From seein her on TV she appears to be brain dead.

Jackson's the one brain dead!

13 posted on 10/25/2003 5:58:59 AM PDT by CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AMNZ
I agree with your post 100%.
14 posted on 10/25/2003 5:59:04 AM PDT by milan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: milan
I think both these girls have it wrong, an earlier article refered to the fact because Shoshana was of higher rank and was held as a POW longer that she deversed more
15 posted on 10/25/2003 6:01:34 AM PDT by boxerblues (If you can read this.. Thank a Teacher..If you can read this in English ..Thank a US Soldier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: boxerblues
forgot the link

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1007730/posts
16 posted on 10/25/2003 6:02:36 AM PDT by boxerblues (If you can read this.. Thank a Teacher..If you can read this in English ..Thank a US Soldier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: boxerblues
Length of time as a POW has no bearing on a disability determination. Rank only has a bearing on the pay scale used, not the percentage of disability.
17 posted on 10/25/2003 6:03:09 AM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: KC Burke
It is NOT arbitrary and it is NEVER racial. Their are FORMULAS based on specific injuries and the severity of those injuries. While I agree that many appeals are rewarded it is MOSTLY due to the continued degradation of the wounds/injuries received as time passes. I have some experience in both areas.
18 posted on 10/25/2003 6:03:20 AM PDT by PISANO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
I know that but do they?
19 posted on 10/25/2003 6:04:00 AM PDT by boxerblues (If you can read this.. Thank a Teacher..If you can read this in English ..Thank a US Soldier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: milan
I think the system is unfair. A 50% disability keeps you from holding 100% of a job.

If a person has to live on that money, and doesn't have family to help them, that's poverty. And we owe our vets more.

If social security kicks in also, well that's better. But I don't think it does.
20 posted on 10/25/2003 6:04:41 AM PDT by I still care
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson