[whereasandsoforth]

Their "anti-war movement" has another unmentioned problem. It is souless. At least the peace & love crowd from the 1960's were real in their beliefs. This crowd, or at least the organization at the top, does not oppose war per se. They oppose the USA and guise it as anti-war. This lack of honesty makes their cause unreal and unappealing to anyone with half a brain who actually might have peace & love as their main concern.

[Snerfling]

They oppose the USA Bush

If Clinton were Pres, there would be no opposition from any quarter.

[norton]

"At least the peace & love crowd from the 1960's were real in their beliefs."

I'm just guessing that you were not around, or draft aged, in the sixties. "Real in their beliefs" meant scared into poopies about being drafted or firmly intending to get an edge on their 'oppressive' opposite gender or 'oppressive' other races, or 'oppressive' meat eaters, etc.

Oh yeah, and the cheap drugs, can't forget the wonderous insights provided by modern chemestry and horticulture.

Real beliefs, yes, principled or otherwise, no.