To: Theodore R.
Post #2080 ~ "Guardian ad litem" ..
I read that Terri's attorney requested another Guardian because Wolfson had already publicly stated that he was not in favor of "Terri's Law" .. therefore, he was biased. I don't know the result. The actual article probably is posted to the new "Terri's Fight" thread ...
2,081 posted on
10/29/2003 7:31:18 AM PST by
Pegita
('Tis so sweet to trust in Jesus, just to take Him at His Word ...)
To: Pegita
So, if Wolfson is "out," how can we be sure that the next choice by this Demers is not another opponent of "Terri's Law"? Wouldn't a court-appointed choice have to tell whether he supports "Terri's Law" up front? If he doesn't support this law, he could not have the support of the Schindler family. Demers is in effect deciding what happens with the appointment of this GAL.
Oh, where, Oh where, has George W. Greer gone?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson