[Hildy]

What evidence of there is that? He's had a lover on the side for most of that time if not all or more. According to what I've read, he's been involved with the other woman for seven years. That's half, not most. I've said on other threads I do not begrudge the man a life for himself.

--- He's got a new family started, he had plenty of spending money from some lawsuit won for Terri's care.Again, he won money for himself, that's his money to spend on what he wants to spend it on. The money for Terri's care, until there's other proof, has been spent on Terri's care. How much does it cost these days to care for someone 24/7? I know three years at the hospice. That leaves 11 years of paid bills. Who paid for that? If there is any money left, how much could it possibly be?

He's always had a choice to divorce Terri and just move on with his life. He just hangs around trying to make sure she dies.Again, don't you think divorce would be the easy way out for him? Maybe, just maybe, he is trying to do what he thinks is right. I'm not saying I know anything for sure, but neither do you. The difference is, I don't go around saying I know what's in the heart of someone else.

[FITZ]

Do you really believe that a man who already has another woman on the side should have complete control over his helpless wife? When you break your vows, the marriage is over or should be. The same would go for a woman who has taken on a new lover ---- should she be the one to decide her husband lives or dies by starvation?