Where did you get this info - or is it just an assumption?
I didn't think that the hospital was sued.
Rather, my understanding is that her doctor(s) who was treating her before the 'event' was sued . . . for not having had certain lab work done that would have detected her problem.
If my info is correct, why would you then falsly accuse the hospital of even having a motive to destroy records.
In any case, it's illegal to destroy records that have been requested as a part of a law suit.
Do you really believe that virtually everyone involved in this matter throughout the years has done these sorts of things?