To: Mo1
I'm laying beats that Terry is nothing more then a test case for the pro-death camp I keep hearing the anti-Terri people saying what a lousy precedent this sets. I really can't see how it sets any precedents that any reasonable person should disagree with:
- Hearsay, by someone with a conflict of interest, regarding an off-the-cuff statement such as described should not, by any stretch, be construed as "clear and compelling evidence" of a desire to be fatally dehydrated.
- A guardian should not be allowed to spend $100's of thousands of his ward's money without a guardian ad litem being appointed.
- A married man who moves in with another woman and fathers children by her should not be considered a proper guardian for an incapacitated wife.
Oh, such horrible precedents this case sets!
1,013 posted on
10/27/2003 7:16:24 PM PST by
supercat
(Why is it that the more "gun safety" laws are passed, the less safe my guns seem?)
To: supercat
Oh, such horrible precedents this case sets! Yes it does, any it should scare people .. especially the Seniors or those about to start their senior years
1,069 posted on
10/27/2003 7:27:24 PM PST by
Mo1
(http://www.favewavs.com/wavs/cartoons/spdemocrats.wav)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson