[supercat]

I'm laying beats that Terry is nothing more then a test case for the pro-death camp

I keep hearing the anti-Terri people saying what a lousy precedent this sets. I really can't see how it sets any precedents that any reasonable person should disagree with:

• Hearsay, by someone with a conflict of interest, regarding an off-the-cuff statement such as described should not, by any stretch, be construed as "clear and compelling evidence" of a desire to be fatally dehydrated.
• A guardian should not be allowed to spend $100's of thousands of his ward's money without a guardian ad litem being appointed.
• A married man who moves in with another woman and fathers children by her should not be considered a proper guardian for an incapacitated wife.

Oh, such horrible precedents this case sets!

[Mo1]

Oh, such horrible precedents this case sets!

Yes it does, any it should scare people .. especially the Seniors or those about to start their senior years