To: jwalsh07
No, but I wonder why you accept everything from the Schindlers without question when it comes to Terri's case. Sorry if bothers you that I maintain my ability to question.
82 posted on
10/23/2003 8:02:03 PM PDT by
Catspaw
To: Catspaw
Actually Catspaw, you offered nothing to the debate here. Nothing prevents you from arguing Michael Schiavos side. You choose not to. I, at least, offer up facts and affidavits to be debated. You choose not to, rather you see it as your duty to question my judgement.
There's no secret here that I am pro life and dubious of the judiciary. Certainly not on my part.
Step up to the plate and post something that should convince me that the judge was correct and the Florida Legislature was wrong.
84 posted on
10/23/2003 8:08:22 PM PDT by
jwalsh07
To: Catspaw; jwalsh07
No, but I wonder why you accept everything from the Schindlers without question when it comes to Terri's case. Sorry if bothers you that I maintain my ability to question.
------------------------
What I see here is an accusation blandly phrased as a question.
However, havings said that. Let's assume for a moment the parity of questionability of the positions of Terri's husband versus that of other members of the family and nurses who have cared for her. Wouldn't that suggest more caution in the rush to kill her? Sorry if bothers you that I maintain my ability to question.
95 posted on
10/23/2003 8:30:10 PM PDT by
RLK
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson