I'm all for Terri continuing to live, but hard-to-believe, unsubstantiated stories only hurt her case.
I AM RESPONDING: Let me see now.
Do you BELIEVE the word of a man:
(1) whose wife has injuries of EXTREMELY SUSPICIOUS source but which have NEVER been INVESTIGATED,
(2) who HAS PETITIONED the COURTS to KILL her several times by starvation and dehydration, and who according to NON-CONFLICTED NURSES, has allegedly apparently INJECTED his wife with INSULIN when she is NOT diabetic, (to cause INSULIN SHOCK),
(3) who received $750,000.00 for his WIFE's REHAB so she CAN learn how to eat and speak but who in SEVERAL YEARS hasn't seen fit to spend even ONE DIME on her REHAB,
(4) whose wife suffered broken bones all over her body according to a BONE SCAN taken approximately 13 months after an alleged "HEART" attack (which was later TOTALLY DISPROVEN by an EKG) and was diagnosed as having a "history of trauma" and "hemmorraging" as a result of trauma,
(5) who stands to KEEP the $750,000.00 if his wife DIES---OR---would have to PAY IT BACK if she LIVES and her BLOOD-RELATED, ACTUALLY-LOVING PARENTS get Guardinship,
(6) who obtained HIS WIFE'S $750,000.00 award FOR REHAB by apparently FRAUDULENT and PERJURIOUS TESTIMONY, and IMMEDIATELY began petitions to have her FEEDING and HYDRATION STOPPED,
(7) who has ABSOLUTELY NO WRITTEN, NOTARIZED DOCUMENTATION of his wife's so-called "WISH TO DIE" yet bases his ENTIRE CLAIM of HER "WISH TO DIE" on HIS WORD* that she said it,
(8) who suddenly REMEMBERED that she said she "WISHED TO DIE" AFTER he COLLECTED HIS WIFE'S $750,000.00 award for HER REHAB,
(9) who IMMEDIATELY AFTER COLLECTING $750,000.00 for HIS WIFE'S REHAB, BEGAN REFUSING ANTIBIOTICS for his wife when she had infections and was allegedly "happy" and "elated" according to NON-CONFLICTED NURSES,
(10) who REFUSES to let his wife's PARENTS & FAMILY to have access to THEIR DAUGHTER and SISTER or her MEDICAL RECORDS,
(11) who ORDERED DNR---"DO NOT RECUSSITATE"---IMMEDICATELY AFTER RECEIVING $750,000.00 for HIS WIFE'S REHAB,
(12) who ORDERED CREMATION to PREVENT INVESTIGATION of possible ATTEMPTED MURDER,
(13) who RECEIVED $300,000.00 for lack of consortium yet has a GIRLFRIEND, a BABY from that relationship, has ANOTHER BABY on the way, and is now ENGAGED to marry her, at which time SHE would SHARE in the $750,000.00 + $300,000.00 that "LOVING" Hitlereque husband has ALREADY RECEIVED (BTW, it sounds like he's getting PLENTY of sex to me!),
(14) whose wife had an alleged SUSPICIOUS, RARE, SUDDEN, ONE-TIME POTASSIUM IMBALANCE (i.e. the same as the "LETHAL INJECTION" a death-penalty receiver gets), which could be TESTED NOW to see if she STILL has a POTASSIUM IMBALANCE,
and
(15) who Pathologist BADEN (?) just stated on Fox News Channel that could have been caused by FOUL PLAY (not his exact words) and "SHOULD HAVE BEEN INVESTIGATGED" back in 1991!!!
Is that the person YOU BELIEVE over NON-CONFLICTED, HANDS-ON NURSES who have given SWORN AFFIDAVITS and have NOTHING TO GAIN and EVERYTHING TO LOSE???
So what is your problem with having this investigated in the light of day, Mr. Sciavo?