No, I would not give him money either but he still could be right about politicians. Time will tell if this is a victory for the babies or the politicians.
I doubt that's the case. The bill is pretty self-explanatory. Unfortunately, Randall Terry is anything but.
He could be a problem but he is not the subject of the bill so why bother discussing him.
You might want to direct that question to those who choose to shoot the messenger rather than debate the message.
Technically, the subject of this thread is Randall Terry's statement about the bill. So, if people want to discuss the person who made the statement, I'd hardly say that's out of bounds.