To: newgeezer
If he's such a loser and a scammer, it shouldn't be too hard to debunk the points in his press release. Right? What's there to rebut? It's just Randall Terry ranting, something he's very good at.
He's just mad he played NO ROLE in getting the PBA ban enacted.
Why, anti-abortion legislation can be passed WITHOUT Randall Terry?
He's always been a gratuitous showboater. Nothing's changed. Just ask Flip Benham.
12 posted on
10/23/2003 2:32:32 PM PDT by
sinkspur
(Adopt a dog or a cat from a shelter! Save a life, and maybe you'll save your own, too!)
To: sinkspur
Our opinion of Randall Terry aside, can you refute the key point of the statement - that the PBA Ban probably won't save any lives, but will give politicians a bill to claim they voted for for years to come?
Again, as I stated in a previous post, I think the political benefits and educational benefits for the voting public are worth it, but I can't refute what he is saying.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson