Skip to comments.
Cosmologists say universe leaves them in the dark
The News-Sentinel (Fort Wayne) ^
| 10/20/03
| Tom Siegfried (Dallas Morning News)
Posted on 10/23/2003 1:56:32 PM PDT by LibWhacker
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
To: RightWhale
Strangely, I have never had a problem with the idea of negative gravity. I have absolutely no problem with adding a new fundamental force to the list. I do have a problem calling it dark energy, b/c, for instance, the units aren't even the same: energy is measured in Joules, and force is measured in Newtons.
21
posted on
10/24/2003 2:10:28 PM PDT
by
KayEyeDoubleDee
(const tag& constTagPassedByReference)
To: KayEyeDoubleDee
It's still handy to think of gravity as a force, but it is the result of a field. The field is a potential energy field, abbreviated as just energy. Such fields seem to surround material objects. It might be that what they are calling dark energy is nothing more than the total effect of alternate positive and negative gradient potential energy fields combined. The totality would be apparent only over intergalactic distances or over galactic cluster distances. Locally it would be just ordinary gravity and those inside the field couldn't tell if it were positive or negative gravity.
22
posted on
10/24/2003 2:17:21 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
To: KevinDavis
a space list ping?
23
posted on
08/21/2004 8:17:33 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(Unlike some people, I have a profile. Okay, maybe it's a little large...)
To: LibWhacker
42. Always has been....always will.
24
posted on
08/21/2004 8:21:36 PM PDT
by
Focault's Pendulum
(I Just fell off the boat!! Kerry I need you! Uh..nevermind, it's only hip deep...right now.)
To: LibWhacker
The universe is infinitely un-understandable.
25
posted on
08/21/2004 8:43:37 PM PDT
by
TheLion
To: AdmSmith; bvw; callisto; ckilmer; dandelion; ganeshpuri89; gobucks; KevinDavis; Las Vegas Dave; ...
26
posted on
03/29/2010 6:50:24 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
("Fools learn from experience. I prefer to learn from the experience of others." -- Otto von Bismarck)
To: LibWhacker
Though one would think an observer on the far side of the universe would see us expanding at near light speed as well, which to us however is clearly not the case. Thus it would seem that some sort of relativistic illusion is possible.
27
posted on
03/29/2010 9:41:12 PM PDT
by
onedoug
To: onedoug
which to us however is clearly not the case. We are receding from them at near light speed, and they from us. The Big Bang and dark energy have pushed us up to this breakneck speed which, of course, we don't sense and can't see if we only look at things near to us. But to anyone who looks out at the most distant reaches of the observable universe, it looks like expansion. The universe scares the crap out of me.
28
posted on
03/30/2010 12:39:34 AM PDT
by
LibWhacker
(America awake!)
To: LibWhacker
The universe scares the crap out of me.Why?
29
posted on
03/30/2010 5:44:29 AM PDT
by
onedoug
To: onedoug
It’s too weird. I wouldn’t mind if physicists never fully understood it. I just don’t want weird.
30
posted on
03/30/2010 9:39:30 AM PDT
by
LibWhacker
(America awake!)
To: LibWhacker
I think God is pleased that humans use their inetellect to try to figure it out, and pass it on to whomever else might be interested, so long as we husband the process. That it seems weird is a reflection of God in that sense, Who has made it good in the image of His goodness.
31
posted on
03/30/2010 10:08:51 AM PDT
by
onedoug
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson