To: nurseinaz
I guess the thing that I don't understand (and probably never will) and have not succeeded in getting a liberal explain to me is: When a convicted murdered is about to be executed and injected with a lethal coctail of chemicals the left will scream: "inhumane!" Yet, this same left has no problem allowing the slow tortuous death of woman whose only crime was getting ill. Whether Terri has a "right to die" or not -- I don't get how anybody can sanction that type of death through slow starvation.
To: MrsEmmaPeel
The only answer I can come up with is those who do not oppose the torturous murder of her have decided, just like in abortion, that they have the knowledge and rights to decide who is worthy of life.
14 posted on
10/22/2003 6:54:49 AM PDT by
fml
To: MrsEmmaPeel
I guess the thing that I don't understand (and probably never will) and have not succeeded in getting a liberal explain to me is: When a convicted murdered is about to be executed and injected with a lethal coctail of chemicals the left will scream: "inhumane!" Yet, this same left has no problem allowing the slow tortuous death of woman whose only crime was getting ill. Whether Terri has a "right to die" or not -- I don't get how anybody can sanction that type of death through slow starvation Such a valid point here!!
46 posted on
10/22/2003 8:15:23 AM PDT by
pollywog
To: MrsEmmaPeel
Yet, this same left has no problem allowing the slow tortuous death of woman whose only crime was getting ill.Mind boggling.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson