To: Devil_Anse
I think in the sale of a business, especially photography, items like pictures and contracts, agreements, for such pictures, come under "intellectual property". I believe Schmidt has his ducks in a row on this one. JMO
To: Sandylapper
Perhaps so. But the sale of that man's business in no way involved Amber Frey. I still say that if a contract does not specify its terms, such as substitution of parties, then those terms do not apply to that contract. IMO, she would have had to agree to it.
So you're saying she, too, could have sold her interest in the contract? If not--why not?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson