Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sandylapper
That Schmidt scum was unbearable to watch. It's all about generating publicity/interest for the website with the pictures.

To tell you the truth, I have trouble believing that Amber and her attorneys are all THAT upset in seeing that site make money, b/c it would just mean more money for THEM, probably. To tell you the truth, I can't help but wonder if there's some collusion going on. I notice Allred didn't represent her in that suit. (Says she's a "witness"...scoff, scoff...)
598 posted on 10/23/2003 9:51:16 PM PDT by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 596 | View Replies ]


To: Devil_Anse
The way I understood this thing with Schmidt, is that some nameless man sold him the business. Along with that sale, he purchased all contracts and agreements. Included was Amber's agreement. So maybe they should be sueing the seller of the business if she had some verbal agreement with him. The seller could have pulled Amber's agreement and destroyed it at the time of the sale, I suppose, or given it to Amber, but he didn't.
602 posted on 10/23/2003 10:05:26 PM PDT by Sandylapper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 598 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson