Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kattracks
the voting public would never have stood for such things as racial quotas or the creation of new "rights" for criminals out of thin air, if this had been done by elected officials.

Tom Sowell hits another one out of the ball park.
Of course everything he says is obvious, but agendas die hard.

This particular idea resonated with me because it should remind us all that even legislators are not elected to indulge their private fantasies of what Constitutional Government means, nor to enjoy a puerile power trip.
Strip them of the title and they are all human beings as the rest of us are, many with the most bizarre quirks and character flaws.

Judgeships for life is a concept born in a simpler age, when certain rules and truths were assumed obvious, self-evident and eternal. That is no longer true.

Rules created during that simpler age have been exploited, twisted and degenerated to satisfy the darker side of our nature and the combination of that with egalitarianism has brought us to an impasse.
Rules must change. But how? and when?
The "why" should be obvious.

The rule by the qualified. Wish I knew the name. Oligarchy is not quite it. It must never be arbitrary. Most Americans should qualify. But there is a pressing need to make sure legislators and judges are not only sane, but also must meet a minimum level of intelligence, knowledge and common sense. We all know what that is but I see a long debate in the attempt to codify it.

No more planting flags on Mars, or conjuring up penumbras, judicial sophistry writ large.

17 posted on 10/23/2003 4:59:41 AM PDT by Publius6961 (40% of Californians are as dumb as a sack of rocks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Publius6961
(40% of Californians are as dumb as a sack of rocks.)

If I were a rock, I would be insulted. No rock has ever voted for a Democrat.

TERM LIMITS are essential if the United States is to survive as a constitutional republic. We need term limits for members of Congress (recommend two six year terms in the Senate and three four year terms in the House). And we need term limits for the federal judiciary (recommend one ten year term with some consideration to a provision that a federal judge can be reappointed once by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate). A ten year term for a judge would make it impossible for the same President to reappoint and in the overwhelming majority of cases, few Senators would be confirming the same judge twice.
23 posted on 10/23/2003 7:24:36 AM PDT by Reagan Renaissance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson