[cyn]

tutstar posted this elsewhere -- you all might already know this, but I didn't:

"Something I just found---Judge Greer is on the Committee For Guardianship Monitoring,
yet he dismissed the findings of Richard Pearse in 2000 at Felos' request.
How ironic, he is involved in Guardianship Monitoring yet doesn't accept the findings of such GAL???"

I thought that M Schiavo was not going to be allowed to keep guardian status...is it just because a new guardian has not been appointed yet?
84 posted on 10/22/2003 10:51 AM PDT by tutstar
-------

also -- is there then a difference of opinion on usefulness of emails /calls (polite ones)?

[floriduh voter]

imo, we are constituents so it's up to us if we want to make a polite phone call or if we want to wait and see what happens at the hearing today. But, at this point, there are threads thanking Governor Bush and I'm sure his staffers are just as tired as we are.

And for the record, at the beginning of our call to action, I stated that FV always wins. Am I going to say to doubters "I told you so?" Naw.

Now it's break time. Take care, cyn.

[Deo volente]

"Judge Greer is on the Committee For Guardianship Monitoring, "





Just like Adolf Eichmann was on the Committee for Railroad Transportation.