To: Dog Gone
On what grounds?
To: Bikers4Bush
I'm not a Florida attorney, but the argument would probably be made on separation of powers grounds.
It's the same principle where the Texas Supreme Court refused to order the runaway Democrat legislators back for redistricting.
11 posted on
10/21/2003 1:32:12 PM PDT by
Dog Gone
To: Bikers4Bush
With greer they are dealing with a kangeroo court.
greer does not need any legal grounds. He will manufacture one.
felows [sp], greer, and michael are in cahots on this case.
Anything felows asks for he gets. He will overturn it.
I did notice that michael has changed his tune slightly.
At this point in time felows, greer, and michael are sweating bullets because their legalized murder of Terri for her insurance money and law suit settlement money scheme be exposed.
This is the reason that Terri must die.
30 posted on
10/21/2003 1:42:01 PM PDT by
sport
To: Bikers4Bush
"On what grounds?"
I don't think it's particularly "conservative" to pass a law allowing the governor to overrule a court ruling, it violates separation of powers.
118 posted on
10/21/2003 2:51:23 PM PDT by
adam_az
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson