To: TexasGunLover
"This time it is to save Terri, next time it could be to prevent my loved one from carrying out my wishes. Remember it's a two way street..."
Have a living will and it won't be a problem. The bill specifically only addresses where a living will didn't exist. I don't care -what- someone's spouse says, a "desire to die" should -never- be upheld by nothing more than oral testimony from the spouse. Infinitely abusable. Especially in this situation, where he's had a huge conflict in terms of financial gain (getting a hold of the malpractice suit award that he swore would be used to rehabilitate her, which he hasn't done).
Qwinn
226 posted on
10/21/2003 1:39:05 PM PDT by
Qwinn
To: Qwinn
Have a living will and it won't be a problem. The bill specifically only addresses where a living will didn't exist. I don't care -what- someone's spouse says, a "desire to die" should -never- be upheld by nothing more than oral testimony from the spouse. Infinitely abusable. Especially in this situation, where he's had a huge conflict in terms of financial gain (getting a hold of the malpractice suit award that he swore would be used to rehabilitate her, which he hasn't done).
I agree with you completely.
230 posted on
10/21/2003 1:40:05 PM PDT by
TexasGunLover
("Either you're with us or you're with the terrorists."-- President George W. Bush)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson