To: KsSunflower
"right to die"
Oh I agree completely, this isn't a right to die case. That's why I support saving her life. I just hate the government making laws that can open the door for restriction of my rights.
182 posted on
10/21/2003 1:24:12 PM PDT by
TexasGunLover
("Either you're with us or you're with the terrorists."-- President George W. Bush)
To: TexasGunLover
Oh I agree completely, this isn't a right to die case. That's why I support saving her life. I just hate the government making laws that can open the door for restriction of my rights. And if they didn't step in then what about the restriction of everybody's rights who become an inconvenience to their caregivers? This is more than personal rights to die here.
To: TexasGunLover
I just hate the government making laws that can open the door for restriction of my rights. Do you prefer judges that side with a husband trying to do away with his wife based on the husband saying she said so?
Do you not see where allowing her death could lead? One step to open the flood gates of any person being able to claim that you said you would not wish to live in that manner and therefore killing you? Judges allowing a husband not to divorce his wife but to kill her and not asking why the husband has fought so very hard to kill?
This would mean any husband (or wife) could claim that a mate said they would not want to live. Therefore the mate would be free to murder with the court's blessing.
503 posted on
10/21/2003 7:59:36 PM PDT by
ClancyJ
(It's just not safe to vote Democratic.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson