To: TroutStalker
What's been keeping the tax man's hand out of this cookie jar thus far is a long history of Supreme Court jurisprudence. Most recently in its 1992 Quill decision, the Court held that the nation's 7,600 tax jurisdictions could impose tax-collection burdens only on companies with a nexus in the taxing jurisdiction. A One World taxing agency means the ultimate destruction of human freedom.
2 posted on
10/21/2003 7:22:24 AM PDT by
thinktwice
("The government is not the owner of the citizen's income." -- Ayn Rand)
To: thinktwice
"
A One World taxing agency means the ultimate destruction of human freedom."
Not at all.
I will simply put minds to work thinking of, and developing ways to yank off the yoke!
4 posted on
10/21/2003 7:32:16 AM PDT by
G.Mason
(Lessons of life need not be fatal)
To: thinktwice
Some of the Congressional testimony confirmed that if local governments were allowed to tax the internet, they could tax anything going through servers in their city / county / state. If you send an email to someone in your own city, it might go through several states and even multiple countries. Each one could legally pile a tax onto your email. If they tax the recipient, then you would be paying hundreds of taxing authorities to learn how to enlarge the size of your sex organs.
![gitmo](http://home.bellsouth.net/coDataImages/p/Groups/133/133192/pages/316580/bulldog.gif)
24 posted on
11/01/2003 8:20:10 AM PST by
gitmo
(Hypocrite: Someone who dare aspire to a higher standard than he is living.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson