To: Quix
I've always been impressed by the photographs of a UFO taken by a Brazilian scientist in full view of his peers and a deck full of naval officers and personnel. (late '50s early 60's?)
The thing was huge, quite manueverable, the picture quality pretty good, and unlike any blimp/rocket/aircraft in either the U.S. or Soviet arsenal.
No one can explain it.
52 posted on
10/21/2003 11:04:32 AM PDT by
Jim Cane
To: Jim Cane
There have actually been quite a number of impossible to difficult to explain photos, videos etc. But, they get lost in the very effective disinformation campaign.
Ah well, if Werner Von Braun was correct in his declaration that after the Soviets playing their bad guy role; followed by terrorism as a world scare followed by a war with Iraq would come a war against ET's . . .
then we should be getting closer to a wholesale shift in reality as we have known it in the public area.
This year? Next year? Not too distant, I think.
64 posted on
10/21/2003 11:24:54 AM PDT by
Quix
To: Jim Cane
I've always been impressed by the photographs of a UFO taken by a Brazilian scientist in full view of his peers and a deck full of naval officers and personnel. (late '50s early 60's?)
The thing was huge, quite manueverable, the picture quality pretty good, and unlike any blimp/rocket/aircraft in either the U.S. or Soviet arsenal.
No one can explain it.
And a magician made the Space Shuttle dissappear outdoors right in front of an audiance. Did the same to Diamond Head to. Admittedly done with mirrors and projectors. I don't think it would be any harder to do a UFO Hoax. IMO a lot smarter to make the Space Shuttle dissapear in front of a paying audiance.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson