Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bonfire
I think I read a thread somewhere that people were really upset because the video -was- posted on the net and then was quickly removed by court order because it violated the order that she could not be taped.

I wonder what the legal reasoning was behind not allowing video taping, anyway. What could it possibly accomplish besides revealing that she is not in as bad a state as people claim?

Qwinn
124 posted on 10/21/2003 1:28:09 AM PDT by Qwinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies ]


To: Qwinn
Thanks. Glad someone else remembers this! Thought maybe I was sleep deprived or something...! (yawn........)
125 posted on 10/21/2003 1:30:19 AM PDT by bonfire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]

To: Qwinn
I wonder what the legal reasoning was behind not allowing video taping, anyway. What could it possibly accomplish besides revealing that she is not in as bad a state as people claim?

There is a movie file terri-cable.mov which I got from an FR-posted link around that time. 11 megs quicktime; it does not show Terri getting up, but it may be the video referred to elsewhere. Perhaps the story of this video got garbled with the story of Terri getting up.

127 posted on 10/21/2003 1:33:22 AM PDT by supercat (Why is it that the more "gun safety" laws are passed, the less safe my guns seem?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson