To: xzins
"I thought in America it was the accused who was presumed innocent."
The issue under consideration is "probable cause." Different than a final determination of guilt, innocence in the TRIAL.
Seasoned criminals know to always plead "not guilty" especially when they are guilty.
Bryant clearly has skilled defense. Let the jury decide.
To: truth_seeker
I don't think I'd call Bryant a seasoned criminal. He's spent too much time playing basketball at his young age to have gotten in too much trouble. This situation was a stupid thing on his part....and cruel to his wife.
But stupidity and being a bad spouse are not crimes, so I don't think he should go to trial just because he's been dumb. (And, yes, I'm assuming his innocence here. Having a girl in his room and having sex with her was dumb ... and a violation of God's law.)
I'm not sure about the trial and the jury. I wouldn't order the trial. I've seen enough to convince me that he shouldn't be convicted. I've got plenty of reasonable doubt.
6 posted on
10/19/2003 11:18:47 PM PDT by
xzins
(Proud to be Army!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson