Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nicaraguan Dream To Rival Panama's Trade Route (New Canal)
The Guardian (UK) ^ | 10-20-2003 | Rupert Widdicombe

Posted on 10/19/2003 8:30:59 PM PDT by blam

Nicaraguan dream to rival Panama's trade route

Price of Central American ambition: $25bn and 10 years' construction over 175 miles

Rupert Widdicombe in Managua
Monday October 20, 2003
The Guardian (UK)

Multi-billion dollar plans to create a rival to the 90-year-old Panama canal by linking a network of rivers and cutting through the jungle of central America are being backed by the goverment of Nicaragua. The new waterway - being proposed by a public private partnership called the Grand Canal Foundation - will cost an estimated $25bn (£15bn) and take 10 years to build. Its proponents say it would turn Nicaragua into the wealthiest nation in Central America within 20 years.

There would be work for 40,000 people during construction, plus the creation of 20,000 permanent operational jobs. A further 120,000 jobs would be indirectly created in tourism and port services.

The canal would be wide and deep enough to handle a new generation of "post-Panamax" container ships that are too big to fit through the Panama canal's locks.

And it would put an end to delays of days or even weeks as ships await passage.

"The Great Canal has been a dream for Nicaragua for many decades," said President Enriqué Bolaños, who lent army helicopters to a commercial Chinese delegation to fly over the proposed route.

The idea of a canal in Nicaragua is not new. The early Spanish colonists received a royal order to carry out what would now be called a feasibility study for developing the established trade route between San Juan river and Lake Nicaragua.

In the 1800s, the US became the leading advocate for an inter-ocean link, reaching an agreement with Nicaragua for a jointly owned canal in 1884.

But in 1902 Nicaragua was pipped at the post by Panama. On the eve of the vote in the US Senate, the pro-Panama lobby sent every senator a Nicaraguan postage stamp showing the Momotombo volcano in full eruption. Even though the volcano was 100 miles from the proposed route, the stamp was enough to persuade the Senate to vote in favour of Panama by just eight votes - a volcano on the island of St Martinique had recently killed 30,000 people.

The stamp episode is a bitter chapter in Nicaraguan history, marking the start of deteriorating relations with the US. The stamp itself has pride of place in the Canal Museum in Panama.

Nicaragua's dreams of a canal linking its Atlantic and Pacific coasts never died and more than one government has dusted off the idea.

The rewards for success appear to be considerable. Nearly 15,000 ships use the Panama canal each year carrying 200m tonnes of cargo, earning the country nearly $800m.

The closest Nicaragua has come was in 1982, when Japanese investors proposed building a canal using giant prefabricated concrete sections.

Since the Sandinista revolution ended with the 1990 elections, three other canal proposals have been put forward.

Two are so-called "dry canals" - high-speed railways designed to carry containers from deep-water ports at either end. Both envisage double-decker trains up to 16 miles long running on a nearly identical route across the country. The cost of the rival plans varies significantly at $1.4bn against $2.6bn.

The third proposal is for the Eco-Canal, modestly priced at just $50m, which would make low-impact use of the San Juan river and Lake Nicaragua.

The river would be dredged in places but maintain its natural riverbanks. Instead of traditional locks, air-powered moveable dams would be used to assist cargo barges to pass two stretches of rapids.

Grand plans

The Eco-Canal will serve national and regional trade, rather than compete for a share of the international container market. It already has the approval of Nicaragua's congress, but has struggled to raise the $4m needed for a feasibility study.

At the opposite end of the budget spectrum is the hugely ambitious Grand canal scheme that would use a series of connecting rivers from the Atlantic to Lake Nicaragua. A canal would be cut through a narrow strip of land separating the lakeshore from the Pacific.

The environment minister, Arturo Harding, says the government is backing the other canal projects too as "they are among the best ways to put an end to our biggest problem: poverty".

The Grand canal now faces the same problem as its rivals - raising the money - only on a much greater scale. The estimated cost is nearly 10 times Nicaragua's annual GDP.

Even if the finance is found, the lesson of the Panama canal is that when the construction starts, the trouble starts.

It took two attempts, the creation of Panama as an independent country, the lives of thousands of workers, and 10 years to build a canal 50 miles long. With 175 miles to cover, what will the final cost be for Nicaragua?


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: canal; latinamerica; nicaragua; nicaraguan; panama; panamacanal; panamas; rival; route; trade; turass
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

1 posted on 10/19/2003 8:31:00 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam
I wonder how the new owners of the Panama Canal are gonna take this heh heh heh
2 posted on 10/19/2003 8:33:53 PM PDT by Chad Fairbanks (Te audire no possum. Musa sapientum fixa est in aure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
bttt
3 posted on 10/19/2003 8:34:05 PM PDT by farmfriend ( Isaiah 55:10,11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chad Fairbanks
China will be upset
4 posted on 10/19/2003 8:36:21 PM PDT by Bogey78O (No! Don't throw me in the briar patch!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bogey78O
Good ;0)
5 posted on 10/19/2003 8:37:15 PM PDT by Chad Fairbanks (Te audire no possum. Musa sapientum fixa est in aure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: blam
I hope Nicaragua finds a way to do this. It absolutely frosts my wires that China "owns" the Panama Canal.
6 posted on 10/19/2003 8:39:56 PM PDT by Oorang ( The United States Constitution (c) 1791. All Rights reserved)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
you think those nut case enviromentalist will not do anything about this?
7 posted on 10/19/2003 8:40:32 PM PDT by Walkingfeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
With the advent of containerized shipping, it would seem likely that the "dry canal" approach just might make the most sense. I would love to see a cost analysis of the two methods to compare the cost to shippers of one method vs. another. The traditional "wet canal" method saves the cost of transferring containers from ships to rail and back to ships, the dry method just might be more cost effective when considering the cost of operating a canal with locks and dams, and the toll needed to offset the cost of building a wet canal in the first place.

Again, I would love to see how these costs would compare to each other. If I had to bet, I'd put my money on the "dry canal" approach.
8 posted on 10/19/2003 8:40:34 PM PDT by Elliott Jackalope (We send our kids to Iraq to fight for them, and they send our jobs to India. Now THAT'S gratitude!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Gotta love competition...
9 posted on 10/19/2003 8:42:47 PM PDT by krb (the statement on the other side of this tagline is false)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

10 posted on 10/19/2003 8:42:56 PM PDT by martin_fierro (A v v n c v l v s M a x i m v s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bogey78O
not too upset.

"The Great Canal has been a dream for Nicaragua for many decades," said President Enriqué Bolaños, who lent army helicopters to a commercial Chinese delegation to fly over the proposed route.

11 posted on 10/19/2003 8:43:42 PM PDT by is_is
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: blam
Will it be wide enough for an aircraft carrier or oil tanker?
12 posted on 10/19/2003 8:50:06 PM PDT by GeronL (Please visit www.geocities.com/geronl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bogey78O
"The Great Canal has been a dream for Nicaragua for many decades," said President Enriqué Bolaños, who lent army helicopters to a commercial Chinese delegation to fly over the proposed route
13 posted on 10/19/2003 8:51:05 PM PDT by GeronL (Please visit www.geocities.com/geronl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: is_is
That sentence caught my eye as well. Since the Chinese basically own the Panama Canal why are they so interested in what Nicaragua is possibly doing. Don't trust the Chinese gov. one bit.
14 posted on 10/19/2003 8:52:01 PM PDT by Oorang ( The United States Constitution (c) 1791. All Rights reserved)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Elliott Jackalope
probably, but what of the coolness factor?
15 posted on 10/19/2003 8:52:03 PM PDT by GeronL (Please visit www.geocities.com/geronl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: blam
At a talk I once attended, Bo Gritz said he saw classified plans detailing the creation of a Nicaraguan canal using nuclear detonation. I don't know how valid these plans were - they may have been speculative or a test of Gritz' ability to withhold secrets - but the tale comes to mind nonetheless.

FYI Bo Gritz was a highly decorated Viet Nam war hero who searched for MIAs and now heads a refuge, of sorts, in Montana.
16 posted on 10/19/2003 8:52:41 PM PDT by JmyBryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
"Will it be wide enough for an aircraft carrier or oil tanker?"

Sounds like it, wider-deeper.

17 posted on 10/19/2003 8:53:38 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: blam
Good!
18 posted on 10/19/2003 8:55:14 PM PDT by RiflemanSharpe (An American for a more socially and fiscally conservation America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
Coolness is fine and dandy, but it don't "feed the bulldog". The bottom line is the bottom line. Either this new passage will make economic sense, or it won't. If it does, then it will make a lot of money for Nicaragua and it will save a lot of money for those who use it.
19 posted on 10/19/2003 8:56:34 PM PDT by Elliott Jackalope (We send our kids to Iraq to fight for them, and they send our jobs to India. Now THAT'S gratitude!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: JmyBryan
"Bo Gritz said he saw classified plans detailing the creation of a Nicaraguan canal using nuclear detonation."

Those ideas have been around for decades. No secrets here.

20 posted on 10/19/2003 8:56:37 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson