Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DannyTN
According to the following site, the reason was that he was focusing on what Jesus taught, the pure moral principles.

You can believe what you wish Danny. Omitting that Jesus is God would seem to change the New testament drastically.

63 posted on 10/19/2003 3:25:12 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: jwalsh07
"You can believe what you wish Danny. Omitting that Jesus is God would seem to change the New testament drastically. "

You can also believe what you wish JWalsh, but the fact is you are focusing on what is left out of the work verses what was left in. It apparently was not titled "the Bible", so was not supposed to be a replacement.

Charles Stanley's sermon this morning was on "God is in Control". If Stanley didn't mentioned that Jesus was God in the sermon, Does that mean that Stanley changed the New Testament drastically? Of course not, Stanley was trying to convey one aspect of the Bible. So was Jefferson. You could pick up any Christian writer today and come to some really eroneous and slanderous assumptions about what they believe, by what they did not mention.

65 posted on 10/19/2003 3:31:13 PM PDT by DannyTN (Note left on my door by a pack of neighborhood dogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson