To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton
Jeb states even now that he cannot interfere with the ruling of the courts...yet by that argument, he could not issue a pardon or a stay of execution because THAT would be interfering with the court's decision of conviction and death sentence, which of course he DOES have the power to do. So his argument in Terri's case doesn't ring true, IMHO.
9 posted on
10/18/2003 5:27:35 PM PDT by
shezza
To: shezza
. So his argument in Terri's case doesn't ring true, IMHO. He's willing to let her starve rather than make political waves. I don't think people will forgive him for it.
I suppose a pro-life Republican will rise to run against him next election cycle.
11 posted on
10/18/2003 5:31:49 PM PDT by
concerned about politics
(What have you done with your life? Have you donated to the Salvation Army this week?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson