[Don Joe]

I thought your point was that if there's new evidence that proves the situation is contrary to the original evidence, justice would prevail. If I misread what you said, I apologize. It's been a rough day. I've had to hit the nitro once so far, and I don't need to do that very often.

[supercat]

I thought your point was that if there's new evidence that proves the situation is contrary to the original evidence, justice would prevail. If I misread what you said, I apologize. It's been a rough day. I've had to hit the nitro once so far, and I don't need to do that very often.

Ah, I see I didn't make myself clear. Allow me to rephrase:

1. The trial court is always right.
2. When the trial court is wrong, refer to rule #1.

Reread my original post with that in mind and see if you agree with it then. And yes I am aware that the ability to reconcile any new finding with the old is merely a necessary but not sufficient condition.