Dissent is one thing, but Kennedy is indirectly accusing Bush of murdering American troops for political and mercenary reasons. Obviously you agree with Kennedy by the tenor of your remarks. And, even after a mountain of evidence which I assume (maybe incorrectly) that you've read and discarded as false, you maintain that Hussein was no threat to our country. Now even the current Dem hypocrites (who concurred with Slick Willy that Hussein was a major threat but now deny they said it) along with all the conservative pols and pundits, independent intel sources, and allies like the Brits and other allies agreed that Saddam was a major threat to the U.S. and regional stability.
So my question to you is where do you get your info to prove that he wasn't a major threat? Simply saying that you choose not believe means should have your own info proving otherwise. Whom and what do you draw your info from?