[carlo3b]

You are dead wrong, I think they should hear both sides, and why not.. I can argue that you are wrong because the scientific evidence surrounding global warming is bogus, ergo all science suspect.

What is the liberal fear about this subject, claiming mixed messages.. Geeeze our kids are getting mixed messages everywhere they turn. Why is this debate so damned dangerous to their future , and the Queer vs straight contradiction so friggin healthy?

[balrog666]

You are dead wrong, I think they should hear both sides

What do you mean both? Are you going to exclude any other creation "theories" in favor of your own favorite? If so, why?

[Long Cut]

"You are dead wrong, I think they should hear both sides, and why not.."

Because we are talking about science, not politics. There is only one "side" of this which is, by virtue of the verifiable evidence supporting it, scientific in nature.

If the "other side" were mentioned, honesty would require the disclaimer that no verifiable evidence supported it.

When geographers and cartogaphers draw up maps and globes, they do not invite comment from people who believe in a flat Earth. Just because something is "another side" doesn't mean it is valid or should be heard.

I notice that the press makes this mistake often, to the point of, after a murder for example, getting the killer's "side of the story".