Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: freeparoundtheclock
I believe the morphine was halted if it ever began in the first place.
Why would she be required to go through this without morphine of some sort? It's not an expensive drug, and she's in a hospice facility, correct? Why do you believe this to be the case?
118 posted on 10/18/2003 9:45:45 AM PDT by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]


To: Clara Lou
>>Why would she be required to go through this without morphine of some sort?

Because the husband hates her and this isn't any normal hospice, the attorney for Schiavo was on the board of directors. Since he is pro-death so is the hospice.

Terri was not terminal, so shouldn't have been in a hospice to begin with. A "real" hospice wouldn't have taken her, they take terminal cancer patients and the like, not just someone who is disabled. A real hospice needs the beds and expects regular turnover when people die.

Terri was placed there by the "husband" and Felos the attorney because they knew they could have total control over her medical treatment or lack of it.

125 posted on 10/18/2003 11:12:31 AM PDT by deannadurbin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson