Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: elfman2
This is a very old attempt at linguistic trickery

How is posting a dictionary entry and then drawing logical conclusions from it trickery ?

200 posted on 10/18/2003 8:18:57 AM PDT by Centurion2000 (Virtue untested is innocence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies ]


To: Centurion2000
"How is posting a dictionary entry and then drawing logical conclusions from it trickery ?"

It’s a fraud because it’s a clumsy and misleading definition, not appropriate as a basis for a philosophical discussion. My Webster’s just defines an Atheist as “One who denies the existence of God”. The first online source that I went to defines Athiesm as Disbelief in or denial of the existence of God or gods . Neither requires the acknowledgment of the existence of something in order to disbelieve in its existence. That’s silly.

Come to think of it, if you have to so misrepresent atheism to feel confident in your religion, it looks like your faith is dependent on my ideology, not the other way around.

239 posted on 10/18/2003 11:17:48 AM PDT by elfman2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson