To: Chad Fairbanks
Are you literate? The caregivers have a positive legal duty to feed this women. Their obediance to an order of a court that requires them to let her die in no way vitiates their duty nor the Governor's duty to enforce the law. The judge has ordered a criminal act, that is ultra vires and therefore null and void. Try reading the statute again. Get help if you cannot understand it.
180 posted on
10/17/2003 8:04:57 PM PDT by
narses
("The do-it-yourself Mass is ended. Go in peace" Francis Cardinal Arinze of Nigeria)
To: narses
I asked a simple, clear question, so that I can understand your perspective, i.e. "where you are coming from" - it helps to do this so that I can better discuss this with you. It's called having a discussion. So, if you'd like to discuss this, in a rational adult manner, great. But drop the condescending attitude. It makes you look stupid.
184 posted on
10/17/2003 8:08:28 PM PDT by
Chad Fairbanks
(Te audire no possum. Musa sapientum fixa est in aure.)
To: narses
The judge has ordered a criminal act Well, there it is.
BIG CEEGAR
to nases who gets it.
In our separation of powers system, the Executive branch is responsible for enforcement.
By his inaction, Governor Bush is in fact enforcing a criminal act.
193 posted on
10/17/2003 8:15:12 PM PDT by
don-o
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson