Skip to comments.
APS: SPACE RACE: SHENZHOU-5 VERSUS MERCURY-5. (supports China and Xlinton space giveaway)
American Physical Society ^
| 10/17/03
| Dr. Robert Park, Scientific Taliban
Posted on 10/17/2003 2:47:10 PM PDT by Diogenesis
American Physical Society: SPACE RACE: SHENZHOU-5 VERSUS MERCURY-5. (supports China and Xlinton space giveaway)
Friday, October 17, 2003
1. SPACE RACE: SHENZHOU-5 VERSUS MERCURY-5.
On Wednesday, China successfully launched the Shenzhou-5 space capsule into orbit with taikonaut Yang Liwei on
board and returned him safely to Earth after 14 orbits. The first American to reach orbit, John G lenn, circled Earth a
mere three times in the Mercury-5 capsule - 3 years before Yang was born. And this is only the beginning; China
hopes eventually to construct a permanent base on the moon. Americans should welcome China's new direction.
Sending humans into space offers no military, economic, or scientific advantage; rather it's a symbolic demonstration
that China has arrived as an economic power and can now afford to waste vast sums of money. Perhaps the U.S.
could help by offering China complete plans for the space shuttle. This would serve the cause of world peace by
diverting China's resources from more dangerous adventures.
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: amphysicalsociety; china; clinton; missiles; shenzhou5; shenzhouv
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
To: Diogenesis
There's just something about this articles writer's analysis that irks me.
They say this: "Americans should welcome China's new direction. Sending humans into space offers no military, economic, or scientific advantage"
Right now we're kinda crippled space wise due to Columbia's breakup, and NASA being a bloated inefficient bureaucracy now.
And the analysts seem to be extremely happy about Chian reaching space.
A few have even suggested we help them.
(Not that Clinton's treason didn't do enough of that?!)
Meanwhile, while NASA sits idle and chases down loony ideas and wastes mpney, China plays catchup and may even pass us.
Their goal, as someone else pointed out, is to get a toehold in space.
Gain the highground, and then from there deny us use of space.
Sun Tzu was from there, and he is studied by their military.
It's almost as if NASA wants to get their butts handed to them and be surpassed by China.
I can't put the thought in words that make sense to others at this time.
21
posted on
10/17/2003 3:42:56 PM PDT
by
Darksheare
(Resistance is futile, but we may be placated with chocolates and shiny trinkets to add to our hord.)
To: al baby
GOD Speed... JOHN GLENN,
Communist China's real...
1st Man in Space.
22
posted on
10/17/2003 3:45:54 PM PDT
by
ALOHA RONNIE
(Vet-Battle of IA DRANG-1965 www.LZXRAY.)
To: Brett66
...The planned Soviet Manned Lunar Lander was precisely the same thing as the new Communist Chinese Model, one man-one capsule.
In other words, Tinker-Toy Land.
...Our Apollo Program got 2 of us on the Moon first so the Soviets cancelled their 1 Man Mission.
Democracy - 1, Communism - 0
23
posted on
10/17/2003 3:56:08 PM PDT
by
ALOHA RONNIE
(Vet-Battle of IA DRANG-1965 www.LZXRAY.)
To: John H K
The Chinese appear to be executing a minimalist approach to space exploration. If their goal is a lunar base, they will take only those steps necessary to achieving that goal. Clearly with their limited throw weight, their modules will be small. The capability to perform Earth orbit rendezvous is key. That is likely to be their next step and why they will take a year to prepare for it.
To: ALOHA RONNIE
Alan Shepherd?
25
posted on
10/17/2003 4:33:41 PM PDT
by
glock rocks
(Support Free Republic -- Pray for our Troops -- God Bless America)
To: glock rocks
I think Ronnie is referring to Glenn's stint as a Democratic US Senator and subsequent flight on the shuttle.
To: Fitzcarraldo; ALOHA RONNIE
Ah, okay. got confused.
27
posted on
10/17/2003 5:07:30 PM PDT
by
glock rocks
(Support Free Republic -- Pray for our Troops -- God Bless America)
To: glock rocks; Mia T; Republic; Mustang; JLO; risk; sport; Joy Angela; conservogirl; ...
...Seems it wasn't Former American Astronaut ALAN SHEPPARD who went on to personally stonewall the Senate's THOMPSON Investigating Committee looking into the CLINTONS' China-Gate giveaway of our Satellite/Missile/NUKE Technologies to Communist China for China Army Money.
...No Siree, t'was Former American Astronaut / U.S. Senator JOHN GLENN who blocked everything Committee Chairman FRED THOMPSON
was trying to do for our Country's Protection.
Soooo, it's...
GOD Speed...JOHN GLENN,
Communist China's real 1st Man in Space..!!!
Fitting, isn't it, to see today that Communist China's real 2nd Man in Space...
...was on a Spy Mission..?
FITS the Mold.
28
posted on
10/17/2003 5:27:38 PM PDT
by
ALOHA RONNIE
(Vet-Battle of IA DRANG-1965 www.LZXRAY.)
To: B-Chan
Bump to everything in your post. :)
29
posted on
10/17/2003 5:30:25 PM PDT
by
Brett66
To: Fitzcarraldo; glock rocks; risk; sport
...After he personally obstructed Senator THOMPSON's Chinagate Invstigating Committee to death...
...Senator JOHN GLENN, now Communist China's real 1st Man in Space, announced he would not be running for a re-election just months away. We all wondered why? Not for long, though.
...About one week later the CLINTON-Appointed NASA Chief gleefully announced to the nation on TV Senator JOHN GLENN's new Shuttle "Mission" into Space to .."Investigate" how well Senior Citizens his age do in Space.
...How does this man ever get any sleep at night..?
...I really wonder.
...Don't you..?
30
posted on
10/17/2003 5:54:46 PM PDT
by
ALOHA RONNIE
(Vet-Battle of IA DRANG-1965 www.LZXRAY.)
To: Diogenesis
There's no excuse for what Clinton did, but I hope that something good can come out of his missile giveaway. This is a tremendous achievement for the Chinese people and I wish them the best in exploring space. Maybe it'll spur some space exploration competitive juices here in America, finally!
31
posted on
10/17/2003 5:56:49 PM PDT
by
JoeSchem
To: Fitzcarraldo
NEVER FORGET
...The THOMPSON Chinagate Senate Committee was also investigating the CLINTONS' Push to turn over our U.S. Long Beach Navy Base to the Communist Chinese, a Navy Base crucial in supporting our U.S. Navy's Mission to protect Taiwan from an Invasion by sea.
...Yesterday's Manned Mission also was so related. China's Manned Capsule had a Lazer on board to test the feasiblility of Blinding from Space OUR Space Satellites ...during an invasion of Taiwan.
...And they're still doing it on OUR Technology Dime..!!!
HOW DOES JOHN GLENN ever get a wink of sleep at Night..???
32
posted on
10/17/2003 6:06:50 PM PDT
by
ALOHA RONNIE
(Vet-Battle of IA DRANG-1965 www.LZXRAY.)
To: JoeSchem
CLINTONS =
"Incomings" Marked: Made in USA
33
posted on
10/17/2003 6:11:40 PM PDT
by
ALOHA RONNIE
(Vet-Battle of IA DRANG-1965 www.LZXRAY.)
To: ALOHA RONNIE
John Glenn is a disgrace even for a democrat.
34
posted on
10/17/2003 6:15:20 PM PDT
by
onyx
To: hopespringseternal
Unless our space program radically changes direction, the 21st century will be the century of China.It's no surprise since they will get all of our money by selling us cheaply made junk at high prices. And us? We just fall deeper into debt.
35
posted on
10/17/2003 6:39:44 PM PDT
by
virgil
To: Diogenesis
Dr. Robert Park, Scientific Taliban
Wasn't this the person who invented cold fusion? Since universities became political indoctrination centers, the science went backwards. I see now some physicists are busy praising how the Chinese discovered the wheel. Who is writing their serious articles? Is it Chinese graduate students? No wonder we lack new energy sources and a robust space program.
36
posted on
10/17/2003 8:15:04 PM PDT
by
singsong
To: Diogenesis
Sending humans into space offers no military, economic, or scientific advantage I have a hard time taking anyone seriously who starts from an idiotic premise like that. Actually, human space flight offers all of the stated advantages, though admittedly not in the very near term.
37
posted on
10/17/2003 8:55:23 PM PDT
by
irv
To: Diogenesis
In an unrelated story, Wal*mart is looking at opening a manufacturing plant on the moon. They figure, if the workers who make 90% of their products are there, they'll need something to do.
To: Fitzcarraldo
Don't we still have sub-launched nuclear missiles?Yes. Trident II/D-5.
39
posted on
10/17/2003 9:49:52 PM PDT
by
RoughDobermann
(Nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.)
To: RoughDobermann
I always wondered why the railroad or shell game land missile basing system was seriously considered in the light of our submarine capability.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson