Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: F.J. Mitchell
No, but I can compare it to another noble experiment that went bad and almost destroyed the country, documented in the history books.

I think it is a stretch to say that Prohibition almost destroyed the country, just as it is a stretch to say that Bill Clinton almost destroyed American. America is a pretty resilient country.

Prohibition had more people using alcohol than ever before, and made billionaires of bootleggers to the extent that their family dynasties are still screwing up the country to this very day.

You can find people who claim it did or didn't increase alcohol use. From the web searches I've done, it seems that people can find facts to support either conclusion. But more importantly, alcohol is not crack or heroin. As I've said in the past, I think people can draw legitimate parallels between Prohibition and anti-marijuana laws but you should note that bans on opiates and many other drugs pre-date Prohibition and have survived its repeal.

Had there been no prohibition, Teddy you know who, would be just one more drunken slob, wallowing around in his own puke,pee and feces in some nameless gutter, instead of being in a position to block every rational bill that his bleary blood shot eyes behold.

If it weren't Teddy, it would be someone else. The country has no shortage of rich leftists.

166 posted on 10/18/2003 4:08:14 PM PDT by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies ]


To: Question_Assumptions
I have come to the conclusion that you are trying to convince me that truth is relative, therefore relatively speaking, a lie is just as good so long as a lot of people believe it.

The truth is, that the results of the destruction that Clinton inflicted upon America has not as yet been fully measured. She is resilient for sure, but the disease she caught from Clinton, is still ravishing her heart, soul and mind ,like AIDS, Cancer or Syphlis, attacks an individual human. THe Clintons represent a new treatment resistant fungus, for which there is not yet a cure, vacination, or even practical advice for avoiding.

THose other rich leftists are far less malignant than the toad man and his clan.
177 posted on 10/19/2003 1:16:27 PM PDT by F.J. Mitchell (The war on drugs is government sponsored affirmative action for drug dealers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson