[Cold Heat]

or advocates of killing the disabled in the name of convenience?

I read it as being allowed to die in the name of dignity and compassion. And now, unfortunately as a result of a court order that never should have been needed.

[Houmatt]

I read it as being allowed to die in the name of dignity and compassion.

Whose dignity? Whose compassion? Do I have to remind you Terri never specified in writing she did not want to be kept alive via artificial means? Do I have to remind you the woman is in fact breathing on her own, the only thing that is being done artifically is she being fed?

There is NO! REASON! WHATSOEVER! to kill this woman other than her husband wants it! He wants to "get on with his life" and to do that, he wants Terri's ended.

Now, tell me, where in the bowels of hell is the dignity and compassion in THAT!?!