Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: anotherview
In the past three years, hundreds of Jews have snuck into the tomb to pray illegally despite a ban issued by the OC Central Command that forbids Israelis from entering areas under full Palestinian control.

Isn't it strange that the alleged "ancestral land" over which "palestinians" have been given "total control" contains no "palestinian" holy sites, and the holy sites it does have is routinely vandalized by them. Why doesn't "the Zionist-controlled mass media" the "palaeos" are always yapping about scream for these people's heads? I doubt the "Jewish media" will even mention this.

The Arabs already vandalized Joseph's tomb several years ago, and they did the same to the tomb of Joshua just a few weeks ago (again, with no word from the "Zionist media").

I wonder just how "holy" the "dome of the rock" would be if there were no Jews claiming it?

68 posted on 10/16/2003 1:10:49 PM PDT by Zionist Conspirator ("Palaeoconservatives" are national relativists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Zionist Conspirator
I wonder just how "holy" the "dome of the rock" would be if there were no Jews claiming it?

Conference for Middle East Peace

The Islamic Claim to Temple Mount

Most of the problems surrounding Jerusalem can be traced to two areas of dispute. One is the political area that asks Jereusalem to be the capital of both Israel and the nascent Palestine. The other and most contentious problem is the holiness of Temple Mount to both Judaism and Islam.

The role Jerusalem has in the Hebrew holy works is well known and not open to debate; however, there are varying opinions on the holiness of Jerusalem, specifically Temple Mount to Islam.

Many if not most opinions that counter Islam's claim point out the Jerusalem is not mentioned in the Quran and did not occupy any special role in Islam until recent political exigencies transformed Jerusalem into Islam's third holy site.

Following is an analysis by a well known scholar:


THE MOSLEM CLAIM TO JERUSALEM IS FALSE

by Dr. Manfred R. Lehmann

The Moslem "claim" to Jerusalem is based on what is written in the Koran, which although Jerusalem is not mentioned even once, nevertheless talks (in Sura 17:1) of the "Furthest Mosque": "Glory be unto Allah who did take his servant for a journey at night from the Sacred Mosque to the Furthest Mosque." But is there any foundation to the Moslem argument that this "Furthest Mosque" (Al-Masujidi al-Aqtza) refers to what is today called the Aksa Mosque in Jerusalem? The answer is, none whatsoever.

In the days of Mohammed, who died in 632 of the Common Era, Jerusalem was a Christian city within the Byzantine Empire. Jerusalem was captured by Khalif Omar only in 638, six years after Mohammed's death. Throughout all this time there were only churches in Jerusalem, and a church stood on the Temple Mount, called the Church of Saint Mary of Justinian, built in the Byzantine architectural style.

The Aksa Mosque was built 20 years after the Dome of the Rock, which was built in 691-692 by Khalif Abd El Malik. The name "Omar Mosque" is therefore false. In or around 711, or about 80 years after Mohammed died, Malik's son, Abd El-Wahd - who ruled from 705-715 - reconstructed the Christian- Byzantine Church of St. Mary and converted it into a mosque. He left the structure as it was, a typical Byzantine "basilica" structure with a row of pillars on either side of the rectangular "ship" in the center. All he added was an onion-like dome on top of the building to make it look like a mosque. He then named it El-Aksa, so it would sound like the one mentioned in the Koran.

Therefore it is crystal clear that Mohammed could never have had this mosque in mind when he compiled the Koran, since it did not exist for another three generations after his death. Rather, as many scholars long ago established, it is logical that Mohammed intended the mosque in Mecca as the "Sacred Mosque," and the mosque in Medina as the "Furthest Mosque." So much for the Moslem claim based on the Aksa Mosque.

With this understood, it is no wonder that Mohammed issued a strict prohibition against facing Jerusalem in prayer, a practice that had been tolerated only for some months in order to lure Jews to convert to Islam. When that effort failed, Mohammed put an abrupt stop to it on February 12, 624. Jerusalem simply never held any sanctity for the Moslems themselves, but only for the Jews in their domain.

[DR. MANFRED R. LEHMANN is a writer for the Algemeiner Journal. Originally published in the Algemeiner Journal, August 19, 1994.]


To attempt to resolve the problem we examined Arab photographs taken about 1875 by the Bonfils out of Lebanon. The photographs are from a Lebanese WEB site whose address is: http://almashriq.hiof.no/general/700/770/779/historical/pcd0109.html, and http://www.lib.uchicago.edu:80/LibInfo/SourcesBySubject/MiddleEast/Photo/Jerusalem.html, and http://almashriq.hiof.no/general/700/770/779/historical/pcd0109/17.jpg

The photos were computer enhanced to build up contrast as they are old and faded.

We also added a photograph of the Western Wall, part of the same collection, to demonstrate Jewish use of the Wall.

Following are some of the description of the photographs:

17 Mosque of Omar [Dome of the Rock] and David's Judgment Seat, Jerusalem, Mosquee d'Omar et tribunal de David.
15 The Jews Wailing Place, a Friday, Mur des Juifs, un vebdredi.
19 Mosque of El-Aksa, Jerusalem, Jerusalem. Mosquee, El-Aksa.
20 Mosque of Omar [Dome of the Rock] from the South, Jerusalem.
Bonfils, ca. 1875. Mount labelled "119. Different cupolas on platform of Temple." Produced by the Bonfils Studio, Beirut, and sold by Charles Taber & Co., New Bedford, Mass. Albumen. Mounted. 11 x 8.5 inches. Acquisition number 43-85.
Bonfils, ca. 1875. Mount labelled "113. Mosque of Omar and Court of David." Produced by the Bonfils Studio, Beirut, and sold by Charles Taber & Co., New Bedford, Mass. Albumen. Mounted. 11 x 8.5 inches. Acquisition number 155-85.

Dome of the Rock
Dome of the Rock
Note overall disrepair and lack of use

Dome of the Rock
Dome of the Rock

Missing tiles

Note missing tiles and condition of roof

Dome of the Rock
Dome of the Rock, additional view


Cupolas on Temple Mount
Note overall disrepair and lack of use

Al Aqsa
Al Aqsa Mosque
Note overall disrepair and lack of use

Western Wall
The Western Wall
In constant use since biblical times


78 posted on 10/16/2003 1:35:48 PM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

To: Zionist Conspirator
I wonder just how "holy" the "dome of the rock" would be if there were no Jews claiming it?

Here's what it looked like when the Turks and the Jordanians were in charge:


88 posted on 10/16/2003 2:51:16 PM PDT by Alouette (Neocon Zionist Media Operative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

To: Zionist Conspirator
I wonder just how "holy" the "dome of the rock" would be if there were no Jews claiming it?

I don’t know, would it revert to the Byzantine Church it once was before the Moslems "converted" it? I am beginning to wonder if the Moose-Slimes are capable of building anything for themselves. I cannot recall a single impressive structure they have built, or technological advance anywhere. Heck they have to steal planes to fly into buildings they cannot build. The fanciest building I have ever seen is a football stadium with no bleachers and a tent in the middle to pray to.

No wonder they desecrate everything in their hands, they can't build anything to compare either with their hands, or their culture. It must be a pretty shameful thing to them. And entire culture based on hatred and envy.

127 posted on 10/17/2003 11:28:53 PM PDT by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson