Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Vigilantcitizen
"Anti-wod : Rush would be in no danger whatsoever of going to jail.

"Pro-wod : If Rush was proven to be purchasing schedule two prescription narcotics from someone other than a lawful source, then he broke the laws I champion and should be prosecuted.

Interesting. But the evidence is long gone. And the subject has put himself into rehab for an acquired abuse due to failed surgery.

446 posted on 10/16/2003 9:11:20 PM PDT by BobS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 442 | View Replies ]


To: BobS
"Interesting. But the evidence is long gone."

Interesting. We don't know either way what the evidence is. That's how y'all defend his innocence.

"And the subject has put himself into rehab for an acquired abuse due to failed surgery."

After a national enquirer story everyone claimed was false, until Rush admitted being addicted.

Notice my pro wod argument started out with the word "if".

448 posted on 10/16/2003 9:32:14 PM PDT by Vigilantcitizen (Habent amicae vestrae magnas clunes? (certe habent!) Hortamini igitur ut eas quatiant (ut quatiant!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 446 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson