To: HitmanNY
If that question is not rhetorical, you should pose it to the Libertarian Party, not me. If I would answer it, I would say "it does not."
167 posted on
10/16/2003 1:10:43 PM PDT by
Petronski
(I'm *NOT* always *CRANKY*.)
To: Petronski
Oh darn. Somehow you think I wasted time on trying to insult you. I must correct you, I would never attempt to compete with the fine job you're doing on yourself.
To: Petronski
It's not rhetorical, and I wonder what would make you think it was. You asked me what good I have done, in a rude and confrontational way, which is unfortunate since I have been neither rude nor confrontational to you.
You asked what good I have done, and I told you. If you would say that my actions are not good, that of course is a matter of opinion, and as I said that would speak volumes for you.
Mind you, you don't know what I think about our national drug policy. For all you know, I could have my position against drug use, use mmy influence as a friend and role model to help people handle or avoid addiction, be against the policy as it has been executed now, and still not agree that federally subsidized housing could be the answer.
Then again, I can have a different opinion. Who knows? Certainly not anyone who hasn't asked me.
Keep the faith, kimosabe. The world isn't as nice a place to live in when approached in some ways. I don't know your approach, so I just thought I'd point that out
177 posted on
10/16/2003 1:18:38 PM PDT by
HitmanLV
(I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson