1 posted on
10/16/2003 10:31:59 AM PDT by
dirtboy
To: dirtboy
bookmark
2 posted on
10/16/2003 10:40:45 AM PDT by
jcb8199
To: dirtboy
I think that, instead of worrying about silly things like pollution and all that, scientists should be trying to stop volcanic eruptions. Talk about spewing pollution straight into the atmosphere!
3 posted on
10/16/2003 10:43:33 AM PDT by
jcb8199
To: dirtboy
Exactly what the discussion needs -- more light, less heat.
5 posted on
10/16/2003 10:48:35 AM PDT by
SAJ
To: dirtboy; ancient_geezer; cogitator
Poing.
dirtboy, about that tagline... Conan meets Medusa?
7 posted on
10/16/2003 10:57:21 AM PDT by
Carry_Okie
(California: Where government is pornography every day!)
To: dirtboy; AAABEST; Ace2U; Alamo-Girl; Alas; amom; AndreaZingg; Anonymous2; ApesForEvolution; ...
Rights, farms, environment ping.
Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from this list.
I don't get offended if you want to be removed.
17 posted on
10/16/2003 4:39:47 PM PDT by
farmfriend
( Isaiah 55:10,11)
To: dirtboy
In the early and mid '80s I participated in high school and (briefly) college debate. For those unfamiliar with this activity, much of it revolves around researching the esoteric nonsense and coming up with arguments that provide the biggest "impact" (effect, e.g. number of bodies you can pile up). I realized there are all sorts of tried and true arguments that appear year after year because they are familiar and are used to argue that whatever the other side wants to do causes war, depression, nuclear war, and all sorts of horrible deaths.
Anyway, global warming has been a mainstay in academic debate competitions for many years, at least since the mid '70s. This is because people like Paul Ehrlich wrote books and articles that give good sound bites, exactly the "evidence" debaters are interested in. As a debater, I didn't care if published sources that I used for evidence made any sense; all I cared about was whether it existed. If the affirmative team was arguing an anti-poverty initiative, for example, I wanted to find a way to link that policy with nuclear war. As dumb as that sounds, it was often easy to do so -- precisely because the idiots screaming about global warming are fanatics who write great debate evidence, but little else.
Global warming has only been at the periphery of mainstream news for a decade (if that) or so. I've know about global warming theories for over 20 years. It was BS then, and its BS now. To the extent it exists, man has virtually nothing to do with it.
28 posted on
10/17/2003 11:52:12 AM PDT by
1L
To: *Global Warming Hoax
To: dirtboy
If NASA wasted less time worrying about this crapola, maybe our space shuttles wouldn't be exploding in midair.
64 posted on
10/21/2003 2:08:56 PM PDT by
jpl
To: dirtboy
bump
104 posted on
10/29/2003 12:48:01 PM PST by
Captain Beyond
(The Hammer of the gods! (Just a cool line from a Led Zep song))
To: dirtboy
Future reference global warming farce bump...
143 posted on
12/16/2003 2:25:07 PM PST by
69ConvertibleFirebird
(Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.)
153 posted on
04/02/2006 1:41:18 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson