Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tray-sea
You have to read the documents sent in to terrisfight.com Jeb can step in to save her life and let the investigation begin into the husband.

is it too much to answer on what basis he can do this? After all that is the topic of this thread. Or are you just satisfied with a pipedream and having someone else to blame if he doesnt take action?

59 posted on 10/16/2003 10:25:52 AM PDT by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: Dave S
This information is at Terri's website - as indicated. Read it. The answer is there.
61 posted on 10/16/2003 10:28:45 AM PDT by fawn796
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

To: Dave S
go read it yourself....more than one legal source consulted....why discuss something if you haven't read it and don't even know what it says?????? We can't read it for you.
62 posted on 10/16/2003 10:28:45 AM PDT by tutstar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

To: Dave S
I won't blame Jeb. He's covering his ass with all these documents. I am not 100% what Jeb is authorized to do but I imagine he can file something to put her tube back in and trump the court ruling on grounds listed in the documents.

This action would have to be followed up with some sort of investigation into the questions about the husband's abuse, her true injuries and the money. Including how this court slipped through this far to begin with.

Let me repeat. I am not beating the it's Jeb's fault drum. He's doing all he can do and the time in NOT on his side. I am sure he'll be able to get her feeding tube back in and it will be business as usual until he takes steps to look deeper into the case.

66 posted on 10/16/2003 10:31:19 AM PDT by tray-sea (I know, my spelling SUCKS.. so sue me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

To: Dave S
He can have this investigated as a criminal case (where it belongs) as opposed to civil, which is where it has been all these years. These documents confirm what we have been saying for months (and Schindler's attorney's for years).
218 posted on 10/16/2003 12:27:01 PM PDT by iowamomforfreedom (Why is it illegal to starve an animal but not a human being?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson