Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rabid Dog; daviddennis
I'd go for a half-and-half approach.

Half of any surplus is used for a rainy-day fund, the other half is rebated to the taxpayers as a percentage of that they paid.

11 posted on 10/20/2003 8:57:28 AM PDT by hchutch ("I don't see what the big deal is, I really don't." - Major Vic Deakins, USAF (ret.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: hchutch
I think what I would probably do is decide on an amount we want for the reserve, and then refund any amounts coming in over that number.

However, there should be a provision where the reserve is increased instead of refund if the cost of processing the refunds is is too similar to their amount. If it costs $10 to process a refund, sending $10 checks isn't going to do any of us any good; instead, add $20 per person to the reserve.

It would probably be best to make the refund a credit on the current year's taxes - maybe it could be reverse-withheld from paychecks.

D
12 posted on 10/20/2003 6:17:34 PM PDT by daviddennis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson