[Zevonismymuse]

Even if the girl had intercourse with one hundred men in the previous one hundred hours it would not negate her right to refuse intercourse with ANYONE.

But it would certainly cause me to doubt her claim that any vaginal swelling,bruising or redness was caused by the one fellow she refused.

I would also be curious about why she said yes to 100 Joe Averages, but said no to the one celebrity with millions of dollars.

[fqued]

(A) Even if the girl had intercourse with one hundred men in the previous one hundred hours it would not negate her right to refuse intercourse with ANYONE.

(B) But it would certainly cause me to doubt her claim that any vaginal swelling,bruising or redness was caused by the one fellow she refused.

PRECISELY the issue. The defense is trying to say that the injuries supposed caused by the [alleged] rape are consistent with injuries caused by having sex with three different men in three days. The error here is that the prosecution brought forth those injuries as evidence of rape. The defense should have a right to refute that evidence by showing it as a possible result of other actions rather than the [alleged] rape