[Servant of the 9]

You earlier stated that this woman wishes to die. You provided no proof. Do have any?

Absent any proof of dishonesty capable of impeaching the husbands testimony, his word is all the proof our legal system requires.

You later required proof for the assertions of myself and others that her husband wishes her to die. You demand proof from others, but refuse to provide any for your statements.

I have no "proof," for my assertions, just overwhelming circumstantial evidence. Your position lacks even that.

Obviously your circumstantial evidence was not found to be overwhelming by a court of competent jurisdiction.

My position requires no proof other than the husbands word. In our system his word is true unless proven false.

So9

[Skooz]

You are missing the entire point.

This woman was not being kept alive by extraordinary means.

She was/is NOT in a coma.

She was/is NOT terminal.

She is being slowly starved to death by removal of a feeding tube.