Skip to comments.
Iran-Contra figure re-emerges as middleman for Iraq information to U.S. government
Associated Press ^
| 10-15-03
Posted on 10/15/2003 12:37:20 PM PDT by Brian S
Edited on 04/13/2004 2:44:25 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
A central figure in the Iran-Contra affair of the 1980s has passed allegations to the Bush administration that $150 million in enriched uranium was smuggled from Iraq into Iran five years ago and some may remain hidden in Iraq.
The information was relayed to the administration through a conservative author, Michael Ledeen. And Ledeen is now accusing the CIA of failing to aggressively check the allegation because of a long-held distrust of Manucher Ghorbanifar, a middleman in the Reagan administration's Iran-Contra swap of arms for hostages.
(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: enricheduranium; ghorbanifar; iaea; iran; iraq; michaelledeen; smuggling
1
posted on
10/15/2003 12:37:20 PM PDT
by
Brian S
To: Brian S
Is Benito trying to bring scandal on this White House as well?
2
posted on
10/15/2003 12:46:17 PM PDT
by
JohnGalt
(And Even the Jordan Rivers' Got Bodies Floating)
To: All
Thank you for helping to keep Free Republic going strong. Another successful fundraiser is in the books!
3
posted on
10/15/2003 12:46:35 PM PDT
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: Brian S
President Bush was hurt earlier this year by bad intelligence about Iraqi efforts to buy uranium from Africa that was included in his State of the Union address to justify the war. Who was the White House suppose to believe? British Intelligence, or Joe Wilson's oral report of his gabbing with about a dozen Nigerians while sipping tea by the hotel pool?
4
posted on
10/15/2003 12:52:00 PM PDT
by
My2Cents
(Well...there you go again.)
To: Brian S
"President Bush was hurt earlier this year by bad intelligence about Iraqi efforts to buy uranium from Africa that was included in his State of the Union address to justify the war. The CIA acknowledges that information turned out to be false and says it had raised concerns about the information with a White House official months before the speech. " Good ol' Pete Yost TM DNC.
He never lets up from pushing Democrat lies.
5
posted on
10/15/2003 1:00:51 PM PDT
by
mrsmith
To: Brian S
The CIA acknowledges that information turned out to be falseNo...that is NOT what the CIA said...
An unsigned CIA memo on Oct. 5 advised that "the CIA had reservations about the British reporting" on Iraq's alleged attempts in Niger, Hadley [Bush's #2 National Security guy] said. A second memo, sent on Oct. 6, elaborated on the CIA's doubts, describing "some weakness in the evidence," such as the fact that Iraq already had a large stock of uranium and probably wouldn't need more, Hadley said.Source
This, from the same CIA that said the convoys of trucks going across the border into the Bekaa Valley "did not register" with them at the time. Not to mention the fact that the British still stand beside their intel.
To: Brian S
"I would have promised those terrorists a trip to Disneyland if it would have gotten the hostages released. I thank God they were satisfied with the missiles and we didn't have to go to that extreme."
To: GalaxieFiveHundred
What about adnan koshoggi?
8
posted on
10/15/2003 6:56:00 PM PDT
by
al baby
(Ice cream does not have bones)
To: GalaxieFiveHundred
I'd still like him to run when Warner finally retires.
9
posted on
10/16/2003 12:14:06 PM PDT
by
GraniteStateConservative
("We happy because when we switch on the TV you never see Saddam Hussein. That's a big happy.")
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson