I think an awful lot of Rush's behavior may be tied to the responsiblity of being Maja Rushie. Think about the daily pressure of being right, funny, ahead of the curve 99.9% of the time. This speculation will incense some people, but the fact is Rush spent a great deal of his time analyzing a variety of situations, and, folks, this is one helluva situation! It is not enough to say he was seduced into this because of back pain; there simply must also be a psychological component and viewing the pressures of the show as part of that is fair game. In that light, I don't particularly want Rush back in thirty days. For the longest time I have complained to my husband, among others, that Rush has "changed." I heard the slurring long ago and in tandem with that was a change in the joy I sensed, and some of the subject matter Rush tackled. He became less pro-life: subjects like abortion and euthanasia, the Terri Schiavo case for instance raging in Florida today, were no longer touched by him. That was a substantial change. Even education and the incredible homosexual lobby were no longer mentioned on his show. In some ways Rush became more libertarian, although he always publicly eschewed that moniker.
I sincerely hope Rush takes all the time necessary to get better. I think it is naive to expect that five years of an addiction will dissolve in thirty days, and I think it is reasonable to discuss if the responsibilities of the very show he is being urged back to didn't at some point overwhelm him.
What I want for Rush is that the person he was gets a chance to heal, to become whole and restored. Whatever spiritual journey he needs to take, I pray he takes and for as long a time as is necessary. For sure, he's got a lot of people back over here waiting patiently, and lovingly for him. V's wife.
So what? Do the opinions of wishy-washy, emotionally immature (feminized "metro-sexual" males, airhead females) and cynical opportunists, carry equal weight with those of intellectually honest, emotionally mature people capable of critical thought?
The "what is true for me, may not be true for you", wishy-washy relativists (liberals) believe that ethical truths change depending upon the situation and the individuals and groups holding them.
They prove that every time they make a *moral/ethics* judgement call about Rush that is different from the judgement call they would make about themselves, their family, and like-minded friends.
Those who suffer from cognitive dissonance (the mental confusion that results from holding polar opposite ideas and beliefs simultaneously) belong in treatment. Instead we find most of them in the DemocRAT party because that's where they feel most comfortable.